Literature review: are we over-screening for deficiency in vitamin D?
Intended for healthcare professionals
Evidence & Practice Previous     Next

Literature review: are we over-screening for deficiency in vitamin D?

Jamie Hum Family nurse practitioner, School of Nursing, Columbia University, New York NY, United States
Michelle Ellis Family nurse practitioner, School of Nursing, Columbia University, New York NY, United States

Vitamin D plays a role in the absorption of calcium and in maintaining healthy bones. It has recently been suggested that deficiency in vitamin D is linked to other diseases, such as colon cancer, heart disease and diabetes. Population-screening for vitamin D deficiency has also been increasing.

The authors' review of published guidelines found no evidence to support population-screening in adult primary care, only that adult patients who are at risk or show signs and symptoms of vitamin D deficiency in primary care should be screened. Those patients deficient in vitamin D should be treated according to current guidelines.

Primary Health Care. 27, 8, 30-34. doi: 10.7748/phc.2017.e1220

Correspondence

jnh2125@columbia.edu

Conflict of interest

None declared

Peer review

This article has been subject to external double-blind peer review and checked for plagiarism using automated software

Received: 20 September 2016

Accepted: 24 April 2017

Want to read more?

Already subscribed? Log in

OR

Unlock full access to RCNi Plus today

Save over 50% on your first 3 months

Your subscription package includes:
  • Unlimited online access to all 10 RCNi Journals and their archives
  • Customisable dashboard featuring 200+ topics
  • RCNi Learning featuring 180+ RCN accredited learning modules
  • RCNi Portfolio to build evidence for revalidation
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
Subscribe
RCN student member? Try Nursing Standard Student

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now

Or