Literature review: are we over-screening for deficiency in vitamin D?
Evidence & Practice Previous     Next

Literature review: are we over-screening for deficiency in vitamin D?

Jamie Hum Family nurse practitioner, School of Nursing, Columbia University, New York NY, United States
Michelle Ellis Family nurse practitioner, School of Nursing, Columbia University, New York NY, United States

Vitamin D plays a role in the absorption of calcium and in maintaining healthy bones. It has recently been suggested that deficiency in vitamin D is linked to other diseases, such as colon cancer, heart disease and diabetes. Population-screening for vitamin D deficiency has also been increasing.

The authors' review of published guidelines found no evidence to support population-screening in adult primary care, only that adult patients who are at risk or show signs and symptoms of vitamin D deficiency in primary care should be screened. Those patients deficient in vitamin D should be treated according to current guidelines.

Primary Health Care. 27, 8, 30-34. doi: 10.7748/phc.2017.e1220

Correspondence

jnh2125@columbia.edu

Conflict of interest

None declared

Peer review

This article has been subject to external double-blind peer review and checked for plagiarism using automated software

Received: 20 September 2016

Accepted: 24 April 2017

Want to read more?

Subscribe for unlimited access

Try 1 month’s access for just £1 and get:

Your subscription package includes:
  • Full access to the website and the online archive
  • Bi-monthly digital edition
  • RCNi Portfolio and interactive CPD quizzes
  • RCNi Learning with 200+ evidence-based modules
  • 10 articles a month from any other RCNi journal
Subscribe
Already subscribed? Log in

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now

Or