The use of van Kaam’s psychophenomenological method to interpret the meaning of resilience in the experiences of people with schizophrenia
Intended for healthcare professionals
Evidence & Practice Previous     Next

The use of van Kaam’s psychophenomenological method to interpret the meaning of resilience in the experiences of people with schizophrenia

Sue Sumskis Lecturer health and social wellbeing, Faculty of Health, Nan Tien Institute, Unanderra New South Wales, Australia, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
Lorna Jane Moxham Professor of mental health nursing, University of Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia

Background Phenomenology is a suitable method for investigating people’s experiences and van Kaam’s psychophenomenological model (PPM) is increasingly being used in nursing research.

Aim To describe the use of PPM to interpret the meaning of resilience in the experiences of people with schizophrenia.

Discussion Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of 14 people with schizophrenia. Analysis of data conformed to van Kaam’s PPM. This asserts that while people experience phenomena differently, there will be essential structures of an experience that are the same for individuals sharing it and aims to identify these common elements. The elements must be explicitly expressed by some of the sample, be implicitly or explicitly expressed by most, and be compatible with the whole.

Conclusion An embedded dynamic of support and challenge in 11 important elements was identified.

Implications for practice PPM is a suitable model for interpreting experiences. However, it is hard for researchers wanting to use the method to find examples of using PPM for analysis. This paper contributes to building original research examples of PPM.

Nurse Researcher. 25, 3, 8-13. doi: 10.7748/nr.2017.e1514

Correspondence

s.sumskis@nantien.edu.au

Peer review

This article has been subject to external double-blind peer review and checked for plagiarism using automated software

Conflict of interest

None declared

Write for us

For information about writing for RCNi journals, contact writeforus@rcni.com

For author guidelines, go to rcni.com/sites/rcn_nspace/files/Nurse-Researcher-guidelines.pdf

Received: 30 July 2016

Accepted: 06 January 2017

Want to read more?

RCNi-Plus
Already have access? Log in

or

3-month trial offer for £5.25/month

Subscribe today and save 50% on your first three months
RCNi Plus users have full access to the following benefits:
  • Unlimited access to all 10 RCNi Journals
  • RCNi Learning featuring over 175 modules to easily earn CPD time
  • NMC-compliant RCNi Revalidation Portfolio to stay on track with your progress
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
  • A customisable dashboard with over 200 topics
Subscribe

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now


Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you.
Find out more