The challenges of researching drug-related emergency department presentations using reviews of medical charts
Rikki Jones Lecturer in nursing, School of Health, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia
Cindy Woods Senior Research Fellow, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia
Kim Usher Professor of Nursing, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia
Background Health research through review of medical charts is a useful way to understand presentations related to the effects and burden of illness, disease and substance misuse. However, the design and methods used in studies can affect their validity and reliability. It is therefore vital to ensure a strong study design and to use appropriate methodologies.
Aim To highlight some of the challenges nurse researchers face when designing and conducting research using reviews of medical charts.
Discussion This paper provides an approach for conducting research using retrospective reviews of charts and potential solutions to inherent challenges involved in such reviews. Using a systematic and scientific approach can maximise the benefits, minimise the limitations, and improve the rigour and impact of nursing research.
Conclusion This paper advances methodological discourse about the challenges inherent when using medical charts for data collection. Despite the inherent challenges, medical charts are an important source of information about injury, disease and substance misuse.
Implications for practice Nursing staff may face challenges when conducting research using patient medical charts. The quality of data abstracted from medical charts is affected by the data abstraction process used as well as the quality and accuracy of clinical documentation.
Jones R, Woods C, Usher K (2018) The challenges of researching drug-related emergency department presentations using reviews of medical charts. Nurse Researcher. doi: 10.7748/nr.2018.e1614
This article has been subject to external double-blind review and has been checked for plagiarism using automated software
Conflict of interest
Published online: 04 December 2018
Want to read more?
Already subscribed? Log in
Unlock full access to RCNi Plus today
Save over 50% on your first 3 months
Your subscription package includes:
- Unlimited online access to all 10 RCNi Journals and their archives
- Customisable dashboard featuring 200+ topics
- RCNi Learning featuring 180+ RCN accredited learning modules
- RCNi Portfolio to build evidence for revalidation
- Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now