• To recognise the challenges of public involvement when researching the health of ethnic minority and marginalised groups
• To be able to identify the complex role peer researchers play in building and maintaining trust between their own communities and academic researchers
• To understand why peer researchers’ reflections on their involvement in participatory research are rarely heard
Background A vital component of research is patient and public involvement (PPI). The challenges of PPI increase when conducting cross-cultural research into sensitive subjects with marginalised ethnic minority groups.
Aim To present the authors’ reflections on conducting peer interviews with members of Roma, Gypsy and Traveller communities.
Discussion The authors provide examples of reflections on collecting data from a participatory research project that explored Gypsies, Roma and Travellers’ experiences of cancer in their communities. They derived the reflections from audio-recorded, post-interview debriefs with co-researchers from the same ethnic backgrounds as interviewees (‘peer researchers’). The main challenges for the peer researchers were cultural, linguistic and pragmatic, all fundamentally related to exploring a sensitive health topic through the lens of ethnicity.
Conclusion Peer researchers recognised their role in building bridges between participants and the research team. They did this by establishing a relationship of trust, minimising distress, representing the views of their communities and obtaining data to meet the aims of the project. Peer researchers perform multiple roles to assist in cross-cultural data collection in participatory research.
Implications for practice This article highlights underexplored aspects of peer researchers’ work that have implications for the planning and conduct of cross-cultural research with marginalised groups.
Nurse Researcher. 30, 1, 17-23. doi: 10.7748/nr.2022.e1818
Correspondence Peer reviewThis article has been subject to external double-blind peer review and checked for plagiarism using automated software
Conflict of interestNone declared
PermissionTo reuse this article or for information about reprints and permissions, please contact permissions@rcni.com
or
Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now
Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you.
Find out more