Development and validation of a methodology to measure the time taken by hospital nurses to make vital signs observations
Evidence and practice    

Development and validation of a methodology to measure the time taken by hospital nurses to make vital signs observations

Chiara Dall’Ora Senior research fellow, National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration Wessex, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, England
Joanna Hope Senior lecturer, National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration Wessex, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, England
Jackie Bridges Professor, Older people’s care, National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration Wessex, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, England
Peter Griffiths Chair, Health services research, National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration Wessex, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, England

Background Several time and motion studies have sought to quantify the nursing work involved in observing patients’ vital signs. However, none of these studies offered a validated methodology that can be replicated. This is reflected in the high variation between these studies in the mean times for measuring and recording observations.

Aim To describe the development and inter-rater reliability of a methodology for observing the nursing time and workload involved in measuring and recording patients’ vital signs.

Discussion The authors developed a methodology that used the quality of interactions (QI) tool (Bridges et al 2018) to measure and record the start and finish times of the rounds of nurses observing vital signs and individual observations clustered in rounds. Two raters concurrently documented their observations of nurses undertaking patient observations in a simulated setting. The tool and associated documentation were found to be easy to use, and there was a high level of agreement in measurements by different observers.

Conclusion The authors’ methodology can be used to reliably measure the time involved in taking vital signs.

Implications for practice Using the QI tool may increase precision when timing and classifying nursing activities concerning observing vital signs. The authors anticipate that it could be adapted effectively to measure several other nursing activities and so support researchers interested in capturing different aspects of nurses’ work.

Nurse Researcher. 28, 3, 52-58. doi: 10.7748/nr.2020.e1716

Correspondence

c.dallora@soton.ac.uk

Peer review

This article has been subject to external double-blind peer review and has been checked for plagiarism using automated software

Conflict of interest

None declared

Permission

To reuse this article or for information about reprints and permissions, please contact permissions@rcni.com

Write for us

For information about writing for RCNi journals, contact writeforus@rcni.com

For author guidelines, go to rcni.com/write-for-nurse-researcher

Want to read more?

Already subscribed? Log in

OR

Unlock full access to RCNi Plus today

Save over 50% on your first 3 months

Your subscription package includes:
  • Unlimited online access to all 10 RCNi Journals and their archives
  • Customisable dashboard featuring 200+ topics
  • RCNi Learning featuring 180+ RCN accredited learning modules
  • RCNi Portfolio to build evidence for revalidation
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
Subscribe
RCN student member? Try Nursing Standard Student

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now

Or