Exploring mental health nurses’ experiences of assault by patients in inpatient settings
Intended for healthcare professionals
Evidence and practice    

Exploring mental health nurses’ experiences of assault by patients in inpatient settings

Helen Ayres DNurs student, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, England
Sue Schutz Senior lecturer, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, England
Olga Kozlowska Senior lecturer, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, England

Why you should read this article:
  • To recognise the extent and harmful effects of patient violence against mental health nurses

  • To explore the factors that may contribute to patient violence against nurses in mental health inpatient settings

  • To enhance your understanding of why nurses may be reluctant to share or report assaults by patients

Mental health nurses working in inpatient settings are at increased risk of being assaulted by patients. Systematic reviews have synthesised predominantly quantitative evidence relating to the prevalence, contributing factors, effects and adverse outcomes of violence towards mental health nurses. This article details a systematic review that used a meta-aggregative approach to synthesise qualitative evidence on the experiences of mental health nurses who have been assaulted by patients in inpatient settings.

The review found that nurses consider violence against them to be a significant and unacceptable issue that can have pervasive effects on their personal and professional lives. Nurses may avoid or suppress their emotions following an assault and may find it challenging to share or report their experiences. Mental health nurses’ perceptions of factors that contribute to, and can prevent, violence and assault include the environment, workforce, relationships, gender and restrictive practices. By focusing on findings generated through qualitative research, this review increases the depth of the existing evidence, using the voices of nurses who have experienced assault to enhance understanding of the issue.

Mental Health Practice. doi: 10.7748/mhp.2023.e1638

Peer review

This article has been subject to external double-blind peer review and checked for plagiarism using automated software

@helenayres76

Correspondence

17002678@brookes.ac.uk

Conflict of interest

None declared

Ayres H, Schutz S, Kozlowska O (2023) Exploring mental health nurses’ experiences of assault by patients in inpatient settings. Mental Health Practice. doi: 10.7748/mhp.2023.e1638

Published online: 21 February 2023

Background

Violence directed towards healthcare workers is a recognised and increasing global issue. Liu et al’s (2019) systematic review and meta-analysis found that around 24% of healthcare workers had experienced physical violence in the previous year, with the figure being significantly higher (51%) for those working in mental health settings. It has been reported that staff working in NHS mental health trusts are approximately seven and a half times more likely to be physically assaulted than staff working in other NHS trusts (Health Service Journal 2018, Mento et al 2020).

Research to date has focused on factors contributing to violence and aggression (Dickens et al 2013, Edward et al 2014), strategies for its prevention and management (Baby et al 2016), and approaches to providing support (Bakes-Denman et al 2021). Several studies have demonstrated associations between the experience of being assaulted and a range of negative consequences for nurses (Seto et al 2020, Hilton et al 2022). For example, it has significant detrimental effects not only on nurses’ personal and professional well-being, but also on their therapeutic relationships with patients (Stevenson and Taylor 2020). Increased absenteeism following incidents of workplace violence was recognised in a review by Phillips (2016), while Adams et al’s (2021) systematic review identified fear of assault and perceived risk of assault to be factors that increase mental health nurses’ intention to leave their job or the profession entirely. Such outcomes ultimately have negative effects on service delivery and patient care.

Systematic literature reviews have sought to synthesise evidence relating to different aspects of the topic, including: the frequency of incidents (Odes et al 2021); the nature, extent and effects of workplace trauma for forensic mental health nurses (Newman et al 2021); the perspectives of patients and staff on the causes of violence and aggression (Fletcher et al 2021); and the prevalence, associated factors and adverse outcomes of violence and aggression towards nurses in mental health settings (Jang et al 2021). The studies included in these reviews reported predominantly quantitative data, with two of the reviews excluding qualitative studies (Jang et al 2021, Odes et al 2021).

Given the under-reporting of assaults on mental health nurses (Morphet et al 2019, Rodrigues et al 2021), the extent of the issue is likely underestimated. At a time when the nursing profession is experiencing substantial workforce shortages globally (Royal College of Nursing 2022), it is increasingly important that this issue is well understood to ensure that policy, guidance and practice are based on reliable evidence. There is no contemporary review and synthesis of evidence gleaned through studies in which mental health nurses were given the opportunity to explore their personal experiences of being assaulted by patients. Therefore, the authors undertook a systematic review to synthesise qualitative research on mental health nurses’ experiences of patient assaults.

Key points

  • Patient assaults on mental health nurses have effects that extend beyond physical injury to their personal and professional lives

  • Discussing violence against mental health nurses as being ‘normal’ or ‘part of the job’ risks invalidating or failing to recognise nurses’ experiences

  • An open, supportive work culture where nurses feel safe to discuss the emotional effects of assault is important

  • Practical, cultural and psychological barriers to mental health nurses reporting assaults have the potential to affect estimations of its prevalence and effects, as well as the provision of support for individuals

  • Supporting mental health nurses who have been assaulted requires an individualised, holistic and non-judgemental approach

Aim

To provide a synthesis of qualitative evidence on the experiences of mental health nurses who have been assaulted by patients in inpatient settings.

Method

This systematic review of qualitative evidence used a meta-aggregative approach, as described by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) (Lockwood et al 2020). This approach is sensitive to the philosophical traditions and perspectives of qualitative research, seeking to remain close to the data and aggregate findings rather than offering a reinterpretation.

Meta-aggregation adopts a pragmatist perspective (Hannes et al 2018) which is borne out in its process-driven approach. The three-stage process involves identifying findings in the selected articles, categorising the findings based on similarities in meaning, and synthesising the categories into a set of overarching findings. The intention is to ensure that what is known through qualitative research about mental health nurses’ experiences of being assaulted informs the strategies designed to improve clinical practice.

Search strategy

The electronic databases Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PsycInfo and PubMed were searched between 15 January 2022 and 21 January 2022. Reference lists of identified articles were also searched manually. Moher et al’s (2015) Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) approach was applied to the search.

The formulation of the review question was guided by Stern et al’s (2014) PICOS framework as follows:

  • P – population: mental health nurses.

  • I – phenomenon of interest: experience of being assaulted by patients.

  • CO – context: inpatient settings.

  • S – study design: qualitative research.

The review question formulated was: ‘How do mental health nurses make sense of their experience of being assaulted by patients in inpatient settings according to reports of qualitative research?’.

Search terms were finalised after multiple test searches varying the use of terms, truncations (assault*; nurs*) and Boolean operators (AND, OR) and a review of keywords used across a sample of the retrieved literature. The search terms used are summarised in Table 1.

Table 1.

Search terms

mhp.2023.e1638_0001_tb1.jpg

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The inclusion and exclusion criteria are summarised in Table 2. An earlier scoping review had indicated that there were few qualitative studies focusing on mental health nurses’ personal experiences of assault by patients in inpatient settings, so no limiters regarding publication dates were placed on this review.

Table 2.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion criteriaExclusion criteria
Population
  • Mental health nurses

  • Nurses with experience of working in inpatient mental health settings

  • Mental health professionals other than nurses

  • Nurses who are not mental health nurses or who do not have experience working in inpatient mental health settings

  • Non-registered staff

Study characteristics
  • Qualitative, empirical research studies

  • Mixed-methods studies

  • Studies using questionnaires that include qualitative data

  • Quantitative studies

  • Theses, dissertations, policies, guidelines, book abstracts, conference abstracts, commentaries and editorials

  • Studies eliciting attitudes, perceptions or experiences exclusively through the administration of standardised questionnaires, which provide little or no qualitative data

Topic of interest
  • Experience of violence, aggression and/or assault in inpatient mental health settings

  • Experience of violence, aggression and/or assault in non-mental health settings, for example emergency departments

  • Experience of violence in older adult mental health settings

Language
  • English

  • All languages other than English

Study selection

A total of 10,646 studies were retrieved from the database searches, with a further 19 articles obtained through hand-searching of reference lists. Following the removal of duplicates, 7,522 articles were screened by title and, where it was unclear whether or not to exclude an article based on its title alone, abstracts were read. Of the remaining 728 articles, 699 full texts were screened as 29 full texts were not obtainable. The selection process resulted in 16 articles for inclusion in the review.

Critical appraisal

The authors independently appraised the selected articles using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research (Lockwood et al 2015). The majority of articles (n=10) lacked clarity regarding their philosophical perspective – for example the ontological and epistemological assumptions underpinning their studies. Most of the articles (n=10) did not situate researchers culturally or theoretically, nor did they address the influence of researchers on the research and vice versa.

Data extraction

Findings relevant to the review question were identified and extracted from each article. The findings were reviewed with reference to their sources and assigned one of three levels of credibility (‘unequivocal’, ‘credible’ and ‘not supported’), as per JBI criteria (Lockwood et al 2020). ‘Unequivocal’ and ‘credible’ findings were included but ‘not supported’ findings were not included.

Findings

The process of meta-aggregation resulted in 16 categories, which were then aggregated into five synthesised findings (Hannes et al 2018). The categories and synthesised findings are presented in Table 3. Table 4 provides a summary of the included articles and is available online at: rcni.com/patients-assault

Table 3.

Synthesised findings and categories

Synthesised findingsCategories
Perspectives on violence against mental health nurses
Mental health nurses consider violence against them – conceptualised in different ways – to be a significant, and unacceptable issue, particularly when perpetrated by patients who they deem to be in control of their behaviour
  • Violence as ‘normal’ and expected but not acceptable

  • Violence can be perceived as unexpected and unpredictable

  • The way in which violence and assault is conceptualised varies

  • Responsibility, control and blame

Personal and professional impact
Being assaulted can have significant and pervasive effects on mental health nurses’ personal and professional lives
  • Effects of being assaulted on oneself as a person and as a nurse

  • Effects of being assaulted on life outside work

  • Effects of being assaulted on nurses’ approach to patients

Response to being assaulted
Following an assault, mental health nurses respond in different ways, including avoiding or suppressing their emotions, depersonalising and rationalising patients’ assaultive behaviour and taking action
  • Attempts to cope through suppressing, avoiding and/or withdrawing

  • Making sense and understanding

  • Active responses

Sharing and reporting experiences
Sharing and reporting experiences of assaults is challenging and often avoided by mental health nurses
  • Sharing experiences beyond the workplace

  • Response from managers and peers

  • Barriers to reporting assaults

Factors affecting violence and assault
Mental health nurses’ perceptions of what contributes to, and can prevent, violence and assault centre on factors relating to the environment, workforce, relationships, restrictive practices and gender
  • Environmental and workforce or team factors

  • Patient factors

  • Factors relating to gender

Discussion

Perspectives on violence against mental health nurses

Violence and assaults on mental health nurses were considered to be frequent, inevitable, expected and ‘normal’ – particularly in the case of verbal violence, which was believed to be ‘part of the job’ (Currid 2008, Baby et al 2014). Despite these widely expressed views, assaults were often described as unexpected, unpredictable and unpreventable (Tema et al 2011, Yang et al 2016), resulting in nurses feeling shocked and confused (Benson et al 2003, Sim et al 2020).

The consensus view among mental health nurses was that while violence and assaults are frequently experienced, they should not be considered acceptable or ‘part of the job’ (Baby et al 2014, Stevenson et al 2015). There was a perception that the violence they experienced was not always taken seriously by their managers and the police (Baby et al 2014, Hiebert et al 2021), and nurses did not consider themselves to be protected by the law (Dean et al 2021). A perception that, in contrast, assaults on police officers and firefighters were taken seriously and responded to with compassion and support led some nurses to feel a sense of unfairness (Moylan and Cullinan 2011, Moylan et al 2014).

Conceptualisations of what constitutes violence in the mental health inpatient context varied between studies. One study included the explicit finding that such conceptualisations are subjective and influenced by multiple factors (Cutcliffe 1999). For example, if an act was believed to be intentional, deliberate and/or premeditated, nurses were more likely to define it as violence or an assault than if an act was believed to be impulsive, reactive and/or driven by symptoms of mental illness (Cutcliffe 1999, Zuzelo et al 2012). Some nurses linked this intentionality and perception of control to a diagnosis of personality disorder, which implied responsibility and prompted blame (Benson et al 2003, Stevenson et al 2015). When a patient was believed to be mentally ill, for example if they were experiencing psychosis, their behaviour was more likely to be considered unintentional, beyond their control and not conceptualised as violence (Cutcliffe 1999, Hiebert et al 2021).

Personal and professional impact

Being assaulted had the potential to have significant and pervasive effects on mental health nurses’ personal and professional lives. The effect in terms of physical injury was not a prominent theme in the included studies, with nurses stating explicitly that psychological trauma often had a more lasting effect than any physical effects (Yang et al 2016). Nurses reported that their self-esteem, confidence and sense of competency were negatively affected following an assault, with nurses blaming themselves on several occasions (Baby et al 2014, Hiebert et al 2021). The emotional effects were consistently described as being pervasive, with fear, anxiety, frustration, anger, guilt and shame being the most frequently reported (Stevenson et al 2015, Dean et al 2021, Ezeobele et al 2021, Hiebert et al 2021).

Mental health nurses’ sense of agency was also negatively affected, with powerlessness and helplessness recognised as consequences of assault (Sim et al 2020, Ezeobele et al 2021). Nurses experienced a loss of dignity, feeling ‘small’ in the face of verbal abuse (Tema et al 2011) and ‘belittled’ when verbal abuse was sexualised (Moylan et al 2014). One finding was that nurses could become desensitised to violence due to its frequency, ‘except the severe stuff’ (Hiebert et al 2021).

The effects of assaults experienced by male mental health nurses featured in the findings of six of the studies (Benson et al 2003, Tema et al 2011, Zuzelo et al 2012, Moylan et al 2014, Dafny and Beccaria 2020, Sim et al 2020). Male nurses were found to be less likely to express emotions than female nurses, instead ‘downplaying’ them (Benson et al 2003). They often saw themselves, and were seen by their peers, as protective factors against assaults on female colleagues (Zuzelo et al 2012, Dafny and Beccaria 2020). However, many male nurses felt responsible, emotionally drained, fearful of injury and undermined professionally when they were seen as ‘bodyguards’ (Tema et al 2011, Dafny and Beccaria 2020).

Many mental health nurses who had been assaulted felt less able to be empathic, compassionate and person-centred (Cutcliffe 1999, Stevenson et al 2015), often distancing themselves and becoming increasingly task-focused as a means of coping and protecting themselves from a further assault (Currid 2008, Ezeobele et al 2021). This, together with a loss of trust and sense of betrayal, made establishing and maintaining therapeutic relationships with patients increasingly challenging (Kindy et al 2005, Sim et al 2020).

As a result of being assaulted, some mental health nurses experienced a conflict in relation to their role. For example, one nurse spoke of ‘[not feeling] like a nurse’ after an assault (Kindy et al 2005), while others found it challenging to reconcile their feelings of anger and frustration with their caring role (Tema et al 2011).

Effects of being assaulted on mental health nurses’ lives outside of work included disturbed sleep, nightmares, hypervigilance and increased smoking and alcohol consumption (Stevenson et al 2015, Hiebert et al 2021). Nurses’ personal relationships were often negatively affected, with nurses describing themselves as being ‘snappy’ and ‘cranky’ with their family members (Kindy et al 2005, Baby et al 2014) and shouting at their children ‘for nothing’ following an assault (Tema et al 2011).

Response to being assaulted

Mental health nurses frequently reported attempting to cope with the emotional effects of being assaulted by suppressing their feelings and withdrawing from others (Kindy et al 2005, Zuzelo et al 2012). The suppression of emotions was also described as a protective strategy, with many nurses believing that showing emotion in front of patients was risky and would make them feel vulnerable (Zuzelo et al 2012, Lantta et al 2016). Phrases such as ‘moving on’, ‘get past it’, ‘leave work at the door’ (Zuzelo et al 2012) and ‘get back on the bike’ (Baby et al 2014) illustrated nurses’ perspectives on what they believed was important or required following an assault.

Many mental health nurses made sense of their experience by seeking to understand and rationalise patients’ assaultive behaviour. Not taking the assault personally was seen as important in being better able to cope, forgive and move on (Benson et al 2003, Sim et al 2020, Dean et al 2021).

The venting of emotions was referred to as helpful by mental health nurses, but this was typically something done in private; for example, one nurse stated: ‘Nobody knows I’m in there crying. I will vent and let go of stuff’ (Zuzelo et al 2012). Becoming hypervigilant was described as a response to being assaulted, such a response being driven by fear and anxiety (Kindy et al 2005, Yang et al 2016). Being assaulted also prompted some nurses to consider leaving their job or the profession altogether (Ezeobele et al 2021, Hiebert et al 2021).

Learning and behavioural changes were identified by nurses as positive outcomes of reflecting on their experiences of being assaulted (Baby et al 2014, Yang et al 2016), but this was not mentioned frequently or explored in any depth.

Sharing and reporting experiences

Mental health nurses often found it challenging to share and report their experiences of being assaulted and many of them avoided doing so. Reasons why they would avoid sharing their experiences of assault with family members included a desire to protect them and the belief that their families – and society more generally – would be unable to understand and empathise (Sim et al 2020), and also might not believe them (Dafny and Beccaria 2020).

Overwhelmingly, mental health nurses who had experienced assault did not feel supported by their employers and perceived their managers’ responses as critical, invalidating, blaming, punishing and stigmatising (Ezeobele et al 2021, Hiebert et al 2021). For example, one nurse described the people who reviewed incident reports as being ‘only concerned with what the nurse did or didn’t do’ (Hiebert et al 2021), while another believed that they had been seen as ‘the perpetrator of the assault and not as a victim’ (Ezeobele et al 2021). Other nurses mentioned critical comments such as ‘You are responsible for maintaining safety, can’t you do that?’ (Moylan et al 2014).

The absence of a response and/or action following an assault was a common experience, leaving mental health nurses feeling marginalised and ignored (Tema et al 2011, Moylan et al 2014). There was a perceived lack of resolution following an assault (Kindy et al 2005), including patients not being held to account for their actions (Dean et al 2021). Many nurses perceived that others expected them to carry on and continue to care for the person who had assaulted them (Stevenson et al 2015, Yang et al 2016). Nurses felt that personal, direct support that recognised and acknowledged their experiences was important and required, as was being given time to access such support (Stevenson et al 2015, Dean et al 2021).

Findings relating to the reporting of assaults highlighted several explanations for under-reporting. Mental health nurses were less likely to report an assault if they did not consider it to be serious enough (Hiebert et al 2021), since they believed that others expected them to ‘let it go’ and were afraid of being seen as ‘making a big deal’ of their experience (Moylan et al 2014). Nurses also had mixed experiences in relation to support from the police, perceiving that they were discouraged from reporting the incident on some occasions (Stevenson et al 2015) and believing that ‘nothing will be done’ (Dafny and Beccaria 2020). A lack of trust in managers, feelings of shame and fear of blame, criticism and/or stigmatisation made many nurses reluctant to report assaults (Dean et al 2021, Ezeobele et al 2021). Other reasons why nurses did not report assaults were a lack of time and the cumbersome forms involved (Hiebert et al 2021), as well as nurses not recognising the importance of reporting (Dean et al 2021).

Factors affecting violence and assault

Mental health nurses’ perceptions of what contributed to, and could prevent, violence and assault centred on factors relating to the environment, workforce, relationships, restrictive practices and gender.

Nurses mentioned various factors such as insufficient staffing, inadequate training and levels of experience, suboptimal physical security, and lack of space and privacy in the work environment (Kindy et al 2005, Hiebert et al 2021). Developing effective therapeutic relationships and having sufficient time to spend with patients were seen as factors that could reduce the risk of violence and assaults (Lantta et al 2016, Ezeobele et al 2021); however, these factors were also perceived as being compromised by high workloads and excessive paperwork (Kindy et al 2005).

To minimise the risk of mental health nurses being targeted for violence by patients, effective and supportive teamwork based on a shared and consistent approach that reinforces team cohesion was widely seen as important (Yang et al 2016, Dean et al 2021). Nurses also perceived that the failure of teams to hold patients to account and agree on consequences for them contributed to the ongoing issue of violence in the workplace (Dean et al 2021). Patients’ experiences of being restricted, treated against their will and not having their needs met were considered to be precursors to assaults (Currid 2008), as were reductions in medicines (Kindy et al 2005).

Finally, mental health nurses discussed gender as a factor that can influence the risk of assaults. Male nurses were perceived as being assaulted more frequently by male patients (Dafny and Beccaria 2020), while female nurses were viewed as more vulnerable, particularly to verbal abuse (Zuzelo et al 2012, Sim et al 2020) and when few male nurses were present (Tema et al 2011).

Limitations

While the review team collaborated in the final selection of articles, critical appraisal and review of findings, the review was largely undertaken by the primary author (HA), thus increasing the risk of bias. Articles not written in English were excluded, which may have resulted in relevant findings being missed. The number of databases and reference lists searched was limited by time and resources, which may have further limited the findings of the review.

Conclusion

This systematic review of qualitative evidence identified that violence by patients against mental health nurses in inpatient settings is a significant and unacceptable issue that has harmful pervasive effects. Factors perceived by nurses as contributing to, or potentially preventing, violence and assault included the environment, workforce, relationships, restrictive practices and gender. The review develops what is known about the experiences of mental health nurses who have been assaulted by patients, and its focus on findings generated through qualitative research enhances the depth of the existing evidence. The authors hope that this will contribute to making the voice of nurses heard, improve understanding of the issue, inform strategies to address it and ultimately enhance practice and patient care.

References

  1. Adams R, Ryan T, Wood E (2021) Understanding the factors that affect retention within the mental health nursing workforce: a systematic review and thematic synthesis. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing. 30, 6, 1476-1497. doi: 10.1111/inm.12904
  2. Baby M, Glue P, Carlyle D (2014) ‘Violence is not part of our job’: a thematic analysis of psychiatric mental health nurses’ experiences of patient assaults from a New Zealand perspective. Issues in Mental Health Nursing. 35, 9, 647-655. doi: 10.3109/01612840.2014.892552
  3. Baby M, Swain N, Gale C (2016) Healthcare managers’ perceptions of patient perpetrated aggression and prevention strategies: a cross sectional survey. Issues in Mental Health Nursing. 37, 7, 507-516. doi: 10.3109/01612840.2016.1166300
  4. Bakes-Denman L, Mansfield Y, Meehan T (2021) Supporting mental health staff following exposure to occupational violence – staff perceptions of ‘peer’ support. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing. 30, 1, 158-166. doi: 10.1111/inm.12767
  5. Benson A, Secker J, Balfe E et al (2003) Discourses of blame: accounting for aggression and violence on an acute mental health inpatient unit. Social Science and Medicine. 57, 5, 917-926. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00460-4
  6. Currid TJ (2008) The lived experience and meaning of stress in acute mental health nurses. British Journal of Nursing. 17, 14, 880-884. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2008.17.14.30652
  7. Cutcliffe J (1999) Qualified nurses’ lived experience of violence perpetuated by individuals suffering from enduring mental health problems: a hermeneutic study. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 36, 2, 105-116. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7489(99)00013-9
  8. Dafny HA, Beccaria G (2020) I do not even tell my partner: nurses’ perceptions of verbal and physical violence against nurses working in a regional hospital. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 29, 17-18, 3336-3348. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15362
  9. Dean L, Butler A, Cuddigan J (2021) The impact of workplace violence toward psychiatric mental health nurses: identifying the facilitators and barriers to supportive resources. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association. 27, 3, 189-202. doi: 10.1177/10783903211010945
  10. Dickens G, Piccirillo M, Alderman N (2013) Causes and management of aggression and violence in a forensic mental health service: perspectives of nurses and patients. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing. 22, 6, 532-544. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2012.00888.x
  11. Edward KL, Ousey K, Warelow P et al (2014) Nursing and aggression in the workplace: a systematic review. British Journal of Nursing. 23, 12, 653-659. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2014.23.12.653
  12. Ezeobele IE, Mock A, McBride R et al (2021) Patient-on-staff assaults: perspectives of mental health staff at an acute inpatient psychiatric teaching hospital in the United States. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research. 53, 3, 242-253. doi: 10.1177/0844562120904624
  13. Fletcher A, Crowe M, Manuel J et al (2021) Comparison of patients’ and staff’s perspectives on the causes of violence and aggression in psychiatric inpatient settings: an integrative review. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing. 28, 5, 924-939. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12758
  14. Hannes K, Petry K, Heyvaert M (2018) The meta-aggregative approach to qualitative evidence synthesis: a worked example on experiences of pupils with special educational needs in inclusive education. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 41, 3, 291-305. doi: 10.1080/1743727X.2017.1299124
  15. Health Service Journal (2018) Violence Against NHS Staff: A Special Report by HSJ and Unison. HSJ, London.
  16. Hiebert BJ, Care WD, Udod SA et al (2021) Psychiatric nurses’ lived experiences of workplace violence in acute care psychiatric units in Western Canada. Issues in Mental Health Nursing. 43, 2, 146-153. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2021.1956656
  17. Hilton NZ, Addison S, Ham E et al (2022) Workplace violence and risk factors for PTSD among psychiatric nurses: systematic review and directions for future research and practice. Journal of Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing. 29, 2, 186-203. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12781
  18. Jang SJ, Son YJ, Lee H (2021) Prevalence, associated factors and adverse outcomes of workplace violence towards nurses in psychiatric settings: a systematic review. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing. 31, 3, 450-468. doi: 10.1111/inm.12951
  19. Kindy D, Petersen S, Parkhurst D (2005) Perilous work: nurses’ experiences in psychiatric units with high risks of assault. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing. 19, 4, 169-175. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2005.05.002
  20. Lantta T, Anttila M, Kontio R et al (2016) Violent events, ward climate and ideas for violence prevention among nurses in psychiatric wards: a focus group study. International Journal of Mental Health Systems. 10, 27. doi: 10.1186/s13033-016-0059-5
  21. Liu J, Gan Y, Jiang H et al (2019) Prevalence of workplace violence against healthcare workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 76, 12, 927-937. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2019-105849
  22. Lockwood C, Munn Z, Porritt K (2015) Qualitative research synthesis: methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare. 13, 3, 179-187. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000062
  23. Lockwood C, Porrit K, Munn Z et al (2020) Chapter 2: systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. In Aromataris E, Munn Z (Eds) JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI, Adelaide SA.
  24. Mento C, Silvestri MC, Bruno A et al (2020) Workplace violence against healthcare professionals: a systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior. 51, 101381. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2020.101381
  25. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M et al (2015) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews. 4, 1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
  26. Morphet J, Griffiths D, Innes K (2019) The trouble with reporting and utilization of workplace violence data in health care. Journal of Nursing Management. 27, 3, 592-598. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12717
  27. Moylan LB, Cullinan MB (2011) Frequency of assault and severity of injury of psychiatric nurses in relation to the nurses’ decision to restrain. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing. 18, 6, 526-534. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2011.01699.x
  28. Moylan LB, Cullinan MB, Kimpel JE (2014) Differences in male and female nurses’ responses to physical assault by psychiatric patients: a supplemental finding of a mixed-methods study. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services. 52, 12, 36-42. doi: 10.3928/02793695-20140903-01
  29. Newman C, Roche M, Elliot D (2021) Exposure to workplace trauma for forensic mental health nurses: a scoping review. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 117, 103897. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103897
  30. Odes R, Chapman S, Harrison R et al (2021) Frequency of violence towards healthcare workers in the United States’ inpatient psychiatric hospitals: a systematic review of literature. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing. 30, 1, 27-46. doi: 10.1111/inm.12812
  31. Phillips JP (2016) Workplace violence against health care workers in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine. 374, 17, 1661-1669. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1501998
  32. Rodrigues NC, Ham E, Kirsh B et al (2021) Mental health workers’ experiences of support and help-seeking following workplace violence: a qualitative study. Nursing and Health Sciences. 23, 2, 381-388. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12816
  33. Royal College of Nursing (2022) UK Staffing for Safe and Effective Care: State of the Nation’s Nursing Labour Market. RCN Biannual Report. RCN, London.
  34. Seto MC, Rodrigues NC, Ham E et al (2020) Post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, and anxiety symptoms and help seeking in psychiatric staff. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 65, 8, 577-583. doi: 10.1177/0706743720916356
  35. Sim IO, Ahn KM, Hwang EJ (2020) Experiences of psychiatric nurses who care for patients with physical and psychological violence: a phenomenological study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 17, 14, 5159. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145159
  36. Stern C, Jordan Z, McArthur A (2014) Developing the review question and inclusion criteria. American Journal of Nursing. 114, 4, 53-56. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000445689.67800.86
  37. Stevenson C, Taylor J (2020) Nurses’ perspectives of factors that influence therapeutic relationships in secure inpatient forensic hospitals. Journal of Forensic Nursing. 16, 3, 169-178. doi: 10.1097/JFN.0000000000000274
  38. Stevenson KN, Jack SM, O’Mara L et al (2015) Registered nurses’ experiences of patient violence on acute care psychiatric inpatient units: an interpretive descriptive study. BMC Nursing. 14, 35. doi: 10.1186/s12912-015-0079-5
  39. Tema TR, Poggenpoel M, Myburgh CP (2011) Experiences of psychiatric nurses exposed to hostility from patients in a forensic ward. Journal of Nursing Management. 19, 7, 915-924. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2011.01304.x
  40. Yang CI, Hsieh WP, Lee LH et al (2016) Assault experiences: lessons learned from mental health nurses in Taiwan. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing. 25, 3, 225-233. doi: 10.1111/inm.12203
  41. Zuzelo PR, Curran SS, Zeserman MA (2012) Registered nurses’ and behavior health associates’ responses to violent inpatient interactions on behavioral health units. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association. 18, 2, 112-126. doi: 10.1177/1078390312438553

Share this page

Related articles

Views of specialist head and neck nurses about changes in their role
The Cancer Reform Strategy (Department of Health 2007)...

Approaches to producing credible and useful literature reviews
Nurses at all stages of their careers can develop...

The biology of cancer
Cancer research is moving fast. Understanding of the biology...

An assessment of the value of music therapy for haemato-oncology patients
The aim of this service evaluation was to assess the value...

The role of lung cancer nurse specialists
A report published by the National Lung Cancer Forum for...