Clinical holding: ethical guidance for children’s nurses working in the UK
Intended for healthcare professionals
Evidence and practice    

Clinical holding: ethical guidance for children’s nurses working in the UK

Andrea Page Associate professor, Department of Mental Health and Learning Disabilities, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, England
Bo Hejlskov Elvén Psychologist, author and PhD student, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, England
Suzanne Seabra Programme lead, Children’s Nursing, University of Chester, Chester, England
Alison Warren Clinical matron for children and young people’s services, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, England
Andrew McDonnell Visiting professor in autism studies, consultant clinical psychologist, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, England
Imogen Lucy Mortiboys Teaching fellow, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, England
Nicola Vanes Senior matron, ophthalmology, Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, England

This article explores ethical decision-making surrounding clinical holding of children and young people in healthcare environments with the aim of enhancing autonomy and engagement on their behalf. A considerable body of evidence, published over the last 20 years, suggests that this complex and challenging area of practice is not always well managed, with mixed messages about the nature of consent, choice and negotiated practice countered by best interests decisions taking precedence ahead of the child’s wishes.

An ethical framework is proposed comprising four levels of value-based interventions and how they may be applied in clinical practice, allowing for increased engagement, empowerment and support on behalf of children and young people in relation to clinical holding decisions.

Nursing Children and Young People. 31, 4, 28-33. doi: 10.7748/ncyp.2019.e1021

Correspondence

andrea.page@bcu.ac.uk

Peer review

This article has been subject to open peer review and has been checked for plagiarism using automated software

Conflict of interest

None declared

Permission

To reuse this article or for information about reprints and permissions, please contact permissions@rcni.com

Write for us

For information about writing for RCNi journals, contact writeforus@rcni.com

For author guidelines, go to rcni.com/writeforus

Want to read more?

RCNi-Plus
Already have access? Log in

or

3-month trial offer for £5.25/month

Subscribe today and save 50% on your first three months
RCNi Plus users have full access to the following benefits:
  • Unlimited access to all 10 RCNi Journals
  • RCNi Learning featuring over 175 modules to easily earn CPD time
  • NMC-compliant RCNi Revalidation Portfolio to stay on track with your progress
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
  • A customisable dashboard with over 200 topics
Subscribe

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now


Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you.
Find out more