Helping young people who have learning disabilities and their families to plan end of life care: the ADVANCE toolkit
Intended for healthcare professionals
CPD    

Helping young people who have learning disabilities and their families to plan end of life care: the ADVANCE toolkit

Ann Gallagher professor of ethics and care, International Care Ethics Observatory, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, England
Matthew Peacock research fellow, International Care Ethics Observatory, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, England
Anne Arber senior lecturer, International Care Ethics Observatory, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, England

Young people who have learning disabilities commonly have many complex and severe life-limiting conditions that result in premature death. Too often neither they nor their family and friends are prepared for end of life situations. End of life care planning is helpful in eliciting and honouring the young person’s wishes, as far as possible. However, it can be challenging due to communication difficulties and limited understanding of the meaning of death and dying.

This article introduces the ADVANCE toolkit featuring a values-based framework that aims to help caregivers who work with young people who have learning disabilities, including nurses, social workers and care assistants, develop their confidence and skills in end of life care planning. The ADVANCE toolkit enables insight in knowing how, when and with whom to discuss the sensitive topic of planning for end of life care. In this article, six activities are included for readers to complete with a view to enabling engagement with the material presented.

Learning Disability Practice. 21, 6, 33-41. doi: 10.7748/ldp.2018.e1914

Correspondence

a.gallagher@surrey.ac.uk

Peer review

This article has been subject to external double-blind peer review and has been checked for plagiarism using automated software

Conflict of interest

None declared

Permission

To reuse this article or for information about reprints and permissions, please contact permissions@rcni.com

Write for us

For information about writing for RCNi journals, contact writeforus@rcni.com

For author guidelines, go to rcni.com/writeforus

Want to read more?

RCNi-Plus
Already have access? Log in

or

3-month trial offer for £5.25/month

Subscribe today and save 50% on your first three months
RCNi Plus users have full access to the following benefits:
  • Unlimited access to all 10 RCNi Journals
  • RCNi Learning featuring over 175 modules to easily earn CPD time
  • NMC-compliant RCNi Revalidation Portfolio to stay on track with your progress
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
  • A customisable dashboard with over 200 topics
Subscribe

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now


Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you.
Find out more