Reviewing the evidence for advanced dressings
Intended for healthcare professionals
Art & Science Previous     Next

Reviewing the evidence for advanced dressings

Martyn Butcher Independent tissue viability and wound care consultant, South West Wound Care Consultancy, Devon
Richard White Professor of tissue viability, University of Worcester, Worcester

The principles of moist wound healing have become widely accepted since the seminal work of George Winter in the 1960s. In the subsequent 50 years, many publications have extolled the clinical value of modern or advanced wound dressings. This article reviews the findings of two studies arguing that the benefits of advanced wound care products, which are based largely on the principles of moist wound healing, cannot be justified in terms of healing outcomes or cost effectiveness. These studies have the potential to affect clinical practice and decision making, and the article highlights the importance of analysing and interpreting the findings of such studies cautiously.

Nursing Standard. 27, 45, 51-62. doi: 10.7748/ns2013.07.27.45.51.e7670

Peer review

This article has been subject to double blind peer review

Received: 12 March 2013

Accepted: 19 April 2013

Want to read more?

RCNi-Plus
Already have access? Log in

or

3-month trial offer for £5.25/month

Subscribe today and save 50% on your first three months
RCNi Plus users have full access to the following benefits:
  • Unlimited access to all 10 RCNi Journals
  • RCNi Learning featuring over 175 modules to easily earn CPD time
  • NMC-compliant RCNi Revalidation Portfolio to stay on track with your progress
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
  • A customisable dashboard with over 200 topics
Subscribe

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now


Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you.
Find out more