Reviewing the evidence for advanced dressings
Art & Science Previous     Next

Reviewing the evidence for advanced dressings

Martyn Butcher Independent tissue viability and wound care consultant, South West Wound Care Consultancy, Devon
Richard White Professor of tissue viability, University of Worcester, Worcester

The principles of moist wound healing have become widely accepted since the seminal work of George Winter in the 1960s. In the subsequent 50 years, many publications have extolled the clinical value of modern or advanced wound dressings. This article reviews the findings of two studies arguing that the benefits of advanced wound care products, which are based largely on the principles of moist wound healing, cannot be justified in terms of healing outcomes or cost effectiveness. These studies have the potential to affect clinical practice and decision making, and the article highlights the importance of analysing and interpreting the findings of such studies cautiously.

Nursing Standard. 27, 45, 51-62. doi: 10.7748/ns2013.07.27.45.51.e7670

Peer review

This article has been subject to double blind peer review

Received: 12 March 2013

Accepted: 19 April 2013

Want to read more?

Subscribe for unlimited access

Try 1 month’s access for just £1 and get:

Your subscription package includes:
  • Full access to nursingstandard.com and the Nursing Standard app
  • The monthly digital edition
  • RCNi Portfolio and interactive CPD quizzes
  • RCNi Learning with 200+ evidence-based modules
  • 10 articles a month from any other RCNi journal
Subscribe
Already subscribed? Log in

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now

Or