Justifying mandatory continuing education
Intended for healthcare professionals
Clinical Continuing Education Previous     Next

Justifying mandatory continuing education

Norah Casey Editor, Nursing Standard

In the second of four articles based on her study tour of the United States, Nursing Standard Editor Norah Casey explores how the case for mandatory continuing education has been presented. Positive and negative aspects are examined, with evidence being drawn from relevant research.

Nursing Standard. 6, 3, 37-40. doi: 10.7748/ns.6.3.37.s46

Your organisation does not have access to this article
Recommend to your librarian
RCNi-Plus
Already have access? Log in

OR

3-month trial offer for �5.25/month

Subscribe today and save 50% on your first three months
RCNi Plus users have full access to the following benefits:
  • Unlimited access to all 10 RCNi Journals
  • RCNi Learning featuring over 175 modules to easily earn CPD time
  • NMC-compliant RCNi Revalidation Portfolio to stay on track with your progress
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
  • A customisable dashboard with over 200 topics
Subscribe

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now


Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you.
Find out more