A procedure for the digital removal of faeces
Intended for healthcare professionals
Art & Science Previous     Next

A procedure for the digital removal of faeces

Gaye Kyle Senior lecturer, Faculty of Health and Human Science, Thames Valley University, Slough, Berkshire
Phil Prynn Continence services manager, Wokingham Primary Care Trust, Wokingham Hospital, Berkshire
Hilary Oliver Head of Continence Services, Kensington and Chelsea Consortium, London

This article describes the development of an evidence-based procedure for the digital removal of faeces (DRF) and the problems and barriers encountered–not least the absence of primary evidence. The procedure for DRF that evolved is based on the best evidence available. It sets out the criteria for performing DRF and directs the practitioner’s actions, while still being adaptable to the individual patient’s situation. It should help to ensure that nurses performing DRF do so within the remit of their professional and legal responsibilities, and that patients receive the most effective care grounded in the current state of knowledge.

Nursing Standard. 19, 20, 33-39. doi: 10.7748/ns2005.01.19.20.33.c3790

Correspondence

Gaye.kyle@tvu.ac.uk

Peer review

This article has been subject to double blind peer review

Want to read more?

RCNi-Plus
Already have access? Log in

or

3-month trial offer for £5.25/month

Subscribe today and save 50% on your first three months
RCNi Plus users have full access to the following benefits:
  • Unlimited access to all 10 RCNi Journals
  • RCNi Learning featuring over 175 modules to easily earn CPD time
  • NMC-compliant RCNi Revalidation Portfolio to stay on track with your progress
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
  • A customisable dashboard with over 200 topics
Subscribe

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now


Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you.
Find out more