Variation of Kozinets’ framework and application to nursing research
Cynthia Witney Former PhD candidate, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia
Joyce Hendricks Coordinator, doctor of health science, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Vicki Cope Research and higher degrees co-ordinator, PhD, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Background Online communities are new sites for undertaking research, with their textual interactions providing a rich source of data in real time. ‘Ethnonetnography’ is a research methodology based on ethnography that can be used in these online communities. In this study, the researcher and a specialist breast care nurse (SBCN) were immersed in the online community, adding to patients’ breast cancer care and providing a nursing research component to the community.
Aim To examine Kozinets’ (2010) framework for ethnonetnography and how it may be varied for use in a purpose-built, disease-specific, online support community.
Discussion The online community provided an area where members could communicate with each other. Kozinets’ (2010) framework was varied in that the research was carried out in a purpose-built community opf which an SBCN was a member who could provide support and advice. The application of the ethnonetnographic methodology has wide implications for clinical nursing practice and research.
Conclusion Ethnonetnography can be used to study disease-specific communities in a focused manner and can provide immediate benefits through the inclusion of an expert nurse and contemporaneous application of research findings to patient care.
Implications for practice With ethical permission and the permission of online community members, nurse researchers can enter already established online communities. Ethnonetnography is ideally suited to nursing research as it provides the immediacy of evidence-based interaction with an expert nurse. These real-time responses improve support for those experiencing a critical life event.
23, 5, 36-41.
This article has been subject to double-blind review and has been checked using antiplagiarism software
Conflict of interest
Received: 22 April 2015
Accepted: 11 November 2015
Want to read more?
Subscribe for unlimited access
Try 1 month’s access for just £1 and get:
Your subscription package includes:
- Full access to the website and the online archive
- Quaterly digital edition
- RCNi Portfolio and interactive CPD quizzes
- RCNi Learning with 200+ evidence-based modules
- 10 articles a month from any other RCNi journal
Already subscribed? Log in
Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now