Understanding the processes of writing papers reflectively
Reflective learning Previous     Next

Understanding the processes of writing papers reflectively

Krishna Regmi Senior lecturer and MSc course leader, Public health Department of Clinical Education and Leadership, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences Institute for Health Research, University of Bedfordshire
Jennie Naidoo Principal lecturer, School of Health and Social Care, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK

Aim This paper explores the writing of research papers using reflective frameworks.

Background Reflective practice is integral to professional education and development. However, healthcare students, academics and practitioners have given limited attention to how to write reflectively. In addition, there are limited resources on the practical aspects of writing papers reflectively.

Data sources The following major databases were searched: PubMed, Medline, King’s Library, Excerpta Medica Database, Department of Health database, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature. The searches were conducted using ‘free text’ and ‘index’ terms. Only relevant papers published in English were reviewed and scrutinised. Unpublished reports, internal publications, snowballing from the reference lists and personal contacts were also included in the search.

Review methods This is a review paper that critiques the frameworks used for reflective practice.

Discussion Writing papers reflectively is a complex task. Healthcare professionals and researchers need to understand the meaning of reflection and make appropriate use of reflective frameworks. Demystifying the process of reflectively writing papers will help professionals develop skills and competencies.

Implication for research/practice This article provides a practical guide to reflection and how nursing and allied healthcare students, academics and practitioners can practise it. The paper identifies four generic stages in frameworks: description, assessment, evaluation and action, which are illustrated by annotated ‘skeletal’ examples. It is hoped that this will assist the process of reflective practice, writing and learning.

Nurse Researcher. 20, 6, 33-39. doi: 10.7748/nr2013.

Peer review

This article has been subject to double blind peer review

Conflict of interest

None declared

Received: 12 March 2012

Accepted: 08 October 2012

Want to read more?

Already subscribed? Log in


Unlock full access to RCNi Plus today

Save over 50% on your first 3 months

Your subscription package includes:
  • Unlimited online access to all 10 RCNi Journals and their archives
  • Customisable dashboard featuring 200+ topics
  • RCNi Learning featuring 180+ RCN accredited learning modules
  • RCNi Portfolio to build evidence for revalidation
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
RCN student member? Try Nursing Standard Student

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now