The effect of interview recording on quality of data obtained: a methodological reflection
Nabeel Al-Yateem PhD candidate, School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland, Galway
Aims This article reflects the author’s experience of qualitative interviews during his research project. It attempts to highlight how recording interviews can affect data collection and data quality.
Background While recording helps researchers keep accurate records of interviews, which in turn assists them during their data analysis, its effect on data quality has not been clarified in nursing literature.
Discussion The research experience highlighted that interview participants, especially those involved in group interviews, were reluctant to give permission for recording and were less comfortable and more formal when being recorded.
Conclusion The preparation for, and how the interview is carried out, can either reduce or further accentuate the effect of interviewing and recording on the participant. Therefore, appropriate strategies to reduce the effects should be implemented.
Implications for research/practice This article suggests strategies to minimise the effects of interviewing and recording of interviews on the participants and hence enhance the quality of data obtained.
Nurse Researcher.
19, 4, 31-35.
doi: 10.7748/nr2012.07.19.4.31.c9222
Peer review
This article has been subject to double blind peer review
Conflict of interest
None declared
Want to read more?
Already subscribed? Log in
OR
Unlock full access to RCNi Plus today
Save over 50% on your first 3 months
Your subscription package includes:
- Unlimited online access to all 10 RCNi Journals and their archives
- Customisable dashboard featuring 200+ topics
- RCNi Learning featuring 180+ RCN accredited learning modules
- RCNi Portfolio to build evidence for revalidation
- Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
Subscribe
Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now
Or