Social research design: framework for integrating philosophical and practical elements
Integration Previous     Next

Social research design: framework for integrating philosophical and practical elements

Kathryn Burns Cunningham PhD candidate/research assistant, University of Dundee, UK

Aim To provide and elucidate a comprehensible framework for the design of social research.

Background An abundance of information exists concerning the process of designing social research. The overall message that can be gleaned is that numerable elements – both philosophical (ontological and epistemological assumptions and theoretical perspective) and practical (issue to be addressed, purpose, aims and research questions) – are influential in the process of selecting a research methodology and methods, and that these elements and their inter-relationships must be considered and explicated to ensure a coherent research design that enables well-founded and meaningful conclusions. There is a lack of guidance concerning the integration of practical and philosophical elements, hindering their consideration and explication.

Data sources The author’s PhD research into loneliness and cancer.

Review methods This is a methodology paper.

Discussion A guiding framework that incorporates all of the philosophical and practical elements influential in social research design is presented. The chronological and informative relationships between the elements are discussed.

Conclusion The framework presented can be used by social researchers to consider and explicate the practical and philosophical elements influential in the selection of a methodology and methods.

Implications for practice/research It is hoped that the framework presented will aid social researchers with the design and the explication of the design of their research, thereby enhancing the credibility of their projects and enabling their research to establish well-founded and meaningful conclusions.

Nurse Researcher. 22, 1, 32-37. doi: 10.7748/nr.22.1.32.e1276

Correspondence

k.b.cunningham@dundee.ac.uk

Peer review

This article has been subject to double blind peer review

Conflict of interest

None declared

Received: 18 August 2013

Accepted: 11 November 2013

Want to read more?

Already subscribed? Log in

OR

Unlock full access to RCNi Plus today

Save over 50% on your first 3 months

Your subscription package includes:
  • Unlimited online access to all 10 RCNi Journals and their archives
  • Customisable dashboard featuring 200+ topics
  • RCNi Learning featuring 180+ RCN accredited learning modules
  • RCNi Portfolio to build evidence for revalidation
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
Subscribe
RCN student member? Try Nursing Standard Student

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now

Or