Consideration of methodological issues when using photo-elicitation in qualitative research
evidence and practice    

Consideration of methodological issues when using photo-elicitation in qualitative research

Sarah Church Head of midwifery division & associate professor, School of Adult Nursing and Midwifery, London South Bank University, London, England
Julie Quilter Clinical assessor, Competency Test Centre, University of Northampton Innovation Centre, Northampton, England

Background The use of photo-elicitation interviews (PEIs) has increased in popularity across a range of disciplines including healthcare. Although qualitative researchers have embraced PEIs as a creative way to explore people’s experiences of their lives and environments, the methodological and practical aspects of using photographs have received little attention in the literature.

Aim To discuss the use of PEI techniques, including sourcing and using photographs.

Discussion The authors discuss definitions of photo-elicitation, and explore the value of and difference between using photographs taken by the researcher and those taken by participants. They consider methodological issues in the context of a small-scale focus group study that used PEIs to explore young women’s conceptualisations of teenage and older motherhood.

Conclusion Using photographs in research is far more complex than providing participants with cameras or presenting them with photographs. Researchers must be aware of the potential bias in the choice, selection and sequencing of photographs, as well as the methodological considerations associated with PEIs.

Implications for practice This article highlights the value of using photographs in qualitative research and presents some of the methodological issues that nurse researchers need to consider when designing and conducting research using photographs.

Nurse Researcher. 29, 2, 25-32. doi: 10.7748/nr.2021.e1729

Correspondence

churchs@lsbu.ac.uk

Peer review

This article has been subject to external double-blind peer review and has been checked for plagiarism using automated software

Conflict of interest

None declared

Permission

To reuse this article or for information about reprints and permissions, please contact permissions@rcni.com

Write for us

For information about writing for RCNi journals, contact writeforus@rcni.com

For author guidelines, go to rcni.com/write-for-nurse-researcher

Want to read more?

Already subscribed? Log in

OR

Unlock full access to RCNi Plus today

Save over 50% on your first 3 months

Your subscription package includes:
  • Unlimited online access to all 10 RCNi Journals and their archives
  • Customisable dashboard featuring 200+ topics
  • RCNi Learning featuring 180+ RCN accredited learning modules
  • RCNi Portfolio to build evidence for revalidation
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
Subscribe
RCN student member? Try Nursing Standard Student

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now

Or