• To be prepared as Bayesian statistical analysis is likely to become more commonly applied in nursing research
• To consider how a Bayesian analysis complements null-hypothesis significance testing and adds value to research results
• To explore simple ways to carry out a Bayesian analysis and interpret a Bayes factor result
Background Classical frequentist statistics, including null-hypothesis significance testing (NHST), dominates nursing and medical research analysis. However, there is increasing recognition that null-hypothesis Bayesian testing (NHBT) merits inclusion in healthcare research analysis.
Aim To recommend that researchers complement the P-value from NHST with a Bayes factor from NHBT in their research analysis.
Discussion Reporting the P-value and a Bayes factor clarifies results that may be difficult to interpret using the P-value alone.
Conclusion NHBT offers statistical and practical advantages that complement NHST.
Nurse Researcher. 28, 4, 41-48. doi: 10.7748/nr.2020.e1756
Correspondence Peer reviewThis article has been subject to external double-blind peer review and has been checked for plagiarism using automated software
Conflict of interestNone declared
PermissionTo reuse this article or for information about reprints and permissions, please contact permissions@rcni.com
Write for usFor information about writing for RCNi journals, contact writeforus@rcni.com
For author guidelines, go to rcni.com/write-for-nurse-researcher
Keywords :
or
Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now
Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you.
Find out more
