A practical guide to the systematic application of nominal group technique
Evidence and practice    

A practical guide to the systematic application of nominal group technique

Rosemary Mullen Lecturer in nursing, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland
Angela Kydd Clinical professor in nursing, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, Scotland
Anne Fleming Independent researcher, Glasgow, Scotland
Laura McMillan Staff tutor, nursing, The Open University, Milton Keynes, England

Why you should read this article:
  • To develop understanding of what nominal group technique is and how it relates to focus group methods

  • To find out how to apply nominal group technique in the context of a research study

  • To gain insight into the strengths and limitations of nominal group technique

Background Nominal group technique (NGT) is a highly structured, commonly used way of exploring areas of interest and developing consensus. However, it is sometimes conflated with focus group methods.

Aim To provide a rationale for selecting NGT as a research method and to examine its systematic application in a doctoral Q-methodology study exploring nursing students’ perspectives of preserving dignity in care.

Discussion An outline of NGT is provided, and it is distinguished from focus group methods. As well as providing a step-by-step guide to using NGT, each step is illustrated with its practical application in the study, and the lessons learned concerning the limitations and strengths of NGT in the context of one study are shared.

Conclusion When applied systematically, NGT enables nurse researchers to collaborate in a meaningful and engaging way with participants and generate tangible outcomes relatively quickly.

Implications for practice This paper offers practical insight into the use of NGT to explore perceptions and develop consensus.

Nurse Researcher. 29, 1, 14-20. doi: 10.7748/nr.2021.e1777



Peer review

This article has been subject to external double-blind peer review and has been checked for plagiarism using automated software

Conflict of interest

None declared


To reuse this article or for information about reprints and permissions, please contact permissions@rcni.com

Write for us

For information about writing for RCNi journals, contact writeforus@rcni.com

For author guidelines, go to rcni.com/write-for-nurse-researcher

Want to read more?

Already subscribed? Log in


Unlock full access to RCNi Plus today

Save over 50% on your first 3 months

Your subscription package includes:
  • Unlimited online access to all 10 RCNi Journals and their archives
  • Customisable dashboard featuring 200+ topics
  • RCNi Learning featuring 180+ RCN accredited learning modules
  • RCNi Portfolio to build evidence for revalidation
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
RCN student member? Try Nursing Standard Student

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now