The Mental Capacity Act and benevolent deception under the guise of ‘best interests’
Intended for healthcare professionals
A&S Science Previous     Next

The Mental Capacity Act and benevolent deception under the guise of ‘best interests’

Gary Watt Continuing care nurse assessor, Nottinghamshire Teaching Primary Care Trust

Lying to a client is fundamentally wrong. But are there rare occasions when ‘benevolent deceit’ may be considered appropriate, if it is in the best interests of someone with a learning disability who lacks capacity? By describing some forms of benevolent deception, Gary Watt hopes to prompt reflection, rather than to undermine choice and control for people who lack capacity

The Mental Capacity Act (2005) provides a statutory framework underpinned by a desire to protect and empower people who are not able to make their own decisions, and who therefore rely on others to help with decision-making on their behalf. Practitioners in the field of learning disabilities are therefore under a duty to have regard for the workings of the Act and its associated code of practice.

Learning Disability Practice. 11, 3, 42-45. doi: 10.7748/ldp2008.04.11.3.42.c6476

Your organisation does not have access to this article
Recommend to your librarian
RCNi-Plus
Already have access? Log in

OR

3-month trial offer for �5.25/month

Subscribe today and save 50% on your first three months
RCNi Plus users have full access to the following benefits:
  • Unlimited access to all 10 RCNi Journals
  • RCNi Learning featuring over 175 modules to easily earn CPD time
  • NMC-compliant RCNi Revalidation Portfolio to stay on track with your progress
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
  • A customisable dashboard with over 200 topics
Subscribe

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now


Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you.
Find out more