Millfields charter drawing the wrong conclusions
Intended for healthcare professionals
A&S Science Previous     Next

Millfields charter drawing the wrong conclusions

Brodie Paterson Department of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Stirling, Stirling

In this second article, Brodie Paterson argues that the Millfields Charter’s proposal to ban the use of prone restraint is based on a misinterpretation of the research evidence and is therefore not the solution the founders of the charter believe it to be. Instead he outlines an alternative strategy to improve service users’ safety which has proved to be effective

The sentiments of those who support the Millfields Charter in seeking to improve service user safety and, in particular, to decrease the risk of further restraint-related deaths in health and social care, are unquestionably laudable. However, the approach chosen in pursuit of such a goal – seeking to ‘ban’ prone restraint – is one with which I, alongside many others, disagree profoundly. This is because as a strategy I believe the proposal is based on misinterpretations of the current research evidence and on an over-simplification of the complex task involved in promoting safer services that is ultimately misleading. As HL Mencken observed: ‘For every problem, there is one solution which is simple, neat and wrong.’

Learning Disability Practice. 10, 3, 30-33. doi: 10.7748/ldp2007.04.10.3.30.c4263

Your organisation does not have access to this article
Recommend to your librarian
RCNi-Plus
Already have access? Log in

OR

3-month trial offer for �5.25/month

Subscribe today and save 50% on your first three months
RCNi Plus users have full access to the following benefits:
  • Unlimited access to all 10 RCNi Journals
  • RCNi Learning featuring over 175 modules to easily earn CPD time
  • NMC-compliant RCNi Revalidation Portfolio to stay on track with your progress
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
  • A customisable dashboard with over 200 topics
Subscribe

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now


Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you.
Find out more