Using assistive technology to encourage independence and well-being in people with complex physical impairments
Intended for healthcare professionals
Evidence and practice    

Using assistive technology to encourage independence and well-being in people with complex physical impairments

Rebecca Haythorne Clinical academic, Leeds and York Partnership, NHS Foundation Trust and University of York, Community Learning Disabilities Team, St Mary’s Hospital, Leeds, England

Why you should read this article:
  • To enhance your understanding of the functional needs of people with complex physical impairments

  • To increase your awareness of challenges and the benefits of environmental control systems

  • To appreciate the role of occupational therapists in the assessment of people’s occupational functioning

Environmental control systems (ECSs) are a form of assistive technology that can enable people with complex physical impairments to operate a range of appliances and devices by remote control, therefore enabling them to maintain a higher level of independence. The functional independence and improved communication abilities afforded by ECSs can, in turn, increase people’s confidence, self-esteem and feelings of self-worth.

Occupational therapists can support people with complex physical impairments to access assistive technology solutions by assessing their need for, and prescribing, ECSs. However, they face challenges, including funding restrictions and a lack of research. Learning disability nurses can benefit from an understanding of the role that assistive technology can play in improving the lives of people with learning disabilities.

This article provides an overview of ECSs, using a case study to illustrate their role in promoting functional independence in people with complex physical impairments.

Learning Disability Practice. 23, 4, 34-37. doi: 10.7748/ldp.2020.e2068

Correspondence

rhaythorne@nhs.net

Peer review

This article has been subject to external double-blind peer review and has been checked for plagiarism using automated software

Conflict of interest

None declared

Permission

To reuse this article or for information about reprints and permissions, please contact permissions@rcni.com

Write for us

For information about writing for RCNi journals, contact writeforus@rcni.com

For author guidelines, go to rcni.com/writeforus

Want to read more?

RCNi-Plus
Already have access? Log in

or

3-month trial offer for £5.25/month

Subscribe today and save 50% on your first three months
RCNi Plus users have full access to the following benefits:
  • Unlimited access to all 10 RCNi Journals
  • RCNi Learning featuring over 175 modules to easily earn CPD time
  • NMC-compliant RCNi Revalidation Portfolio to stay on track with your progress
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
  • A customisable dashboard with over 200 topics
Subscribe

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now


Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you.
Find out more