Stakeholders’ views on screening for intellectual disability in mainstream schools
Intended for healthcare professionals
Evidence and practice    

Stakeholders’ views on screening for intellectual disability in mainstream schools

Dale Metcalfe Assistant professor, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, England
Karen McKenzie Professor, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, England
George Murray Clinical psychologist, NEAT Academy Trust, North Shields, England

Why you should read this article:
  • To recognise the barriers to effective identification of children with intellectual disabilities in mainstream schools

  • To acknowledge the adverse effects of lack of effective identification of children with intellectual disabilities in mainstream schools

  • To read about healthcare and education professionals’ and parents’ views on the use of a screening tool for identification of intellectual disability in children in mainstream schools

Background Identifying children with intellectual disability in mainstream schools has been described as a ‘postcode lottery’. Children with an intellectual disability may be at risk of being ‘hidden’ in schools because they are included in broader categories, such as having developmental disabilities.

Aim To explore stakeholders’ views on the use of a screening tool for intellectual disability in mainstream schools.

Method The study used semi-structured interviews to obtain the views of stakeholders about processes for identifying children with intellectual disabilities. The interviews involved six participants – healthcare and education professionals and a parent advocate and advisor – and the findings were analysed using thematic analysis.

Findings Two themes were identified: barriers to the identification of intellectual disability; and the role and impact of a screening tool and what is the point of it?

Conclusion The findings suggest that screening for intellectual disability in mainstream schools could provide a more consistent, evidence-based method of improving identification and helping to validate the concerns of parents and teachers.

Learning Disability Practice. doi: 10.7748/ldp.2025.e2267

Peer review

This article has been subject to external double-blind peer review and checked for plagiarism using automated software

Correspondence

dale.r.metcalfe@northumbria.ac.uk

Conflict of interest

Karen McKenzie and George Murray are co-developers of the Child and Adolescent Intellectual Disability Screening Questionnaire (CAIDS-Q) and receive small amounts of funding for its use in some circumstances, but not for the current project. This study was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) North East and North Cumbria (NENC) (NIHR200173). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care

Metcalfe D, McKenzie K, Murray G (2025) Stakeholders’ views on screening for intellectual disability in mainstream schools. Learning Disability Practice. doi: 10.7748/ldp.2025.e2267

Published online: 27 March 2025

Want to read more?

RCNi-Plus
Already have access? Log in

or

3-month trial offer for £5.25/month

Subscribe today and save 50% on your first three months
RCNi Plus users have full access to the following benefits:
  • Unlimited access to all 10 RCNi Journals
  • RCNi Learning featuring over 175 modules to easily earn CPD time
  • NMC-compliant RCNi Revalidation Portfolio to stay on track with your progress
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
  • A customisable dashboard with over 200 topics
Subscribe

Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you.
Find out more

Jobs