Exploring the accuracy of the online version of the Learning Disability Screening Questionnaire
Intended for healthcare professionals
Evidence and practice    

Exploring the accuracy of the online version of the Learning Disability Screening Questionnaire

Karen McKenzie Professor of psychology/clinical psychologist, Department of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, England

Why you should read this article:
  • To read about the sensitivity and test-retest reliability of the online Learning Disability Screening Questionnaire

  • To recognise why intellectual disability screening tools must have good psychometric properties

  • To understand what can influence the responses of a person with an intellectual disability to a screening tool

Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic prompted an increase in the use of online versions of developmental assessment and screening tools. It is important to determine whether putting assessments and screening tools online influences their accuracy.

Aim To examine some of the psychometric properties of the online version of the Learning Disability Screening Questionnaire (LDSQ) in a large general population sample.

Method Pre-existing anonymous data, which had been automatically collected from 758 users of the online LDSQ, were analysed using quantitative methodology.

Results Sensitivity values were above the recommended minimum value of 70% but somewhat lower than the sensitivity values found in validation studies which used the paper version of the LDSQ. Test-retest reliability was good. People with a false negative outcome were significantly more likely to have completed the LDSQ about themselves. The online LDSQ demonstrated good levels of accuracy when screening for intellectual disability among autistic people.

Conclusion The psychometric properties of the online version of the LDSQ are broadly similar to those of the paper version. The online LDSQ may offer an accessible, quick and easy way to help reduce the number of people with intellectual disabilities who are ‘hidden’ from healthcare services.

Learning Disability Practice. doi: 10.7748/ldp.2024.e2244

Peer review

This article has been subject to external double-blind peer review and checked for plagiarism using automated software

Correspondence

k.mckenzie@northumbria.ac.uk

Conflict of interest

The author was a co-developer of the Learning Disability Screening Questionnaire and sometimes receives a small income from its use

McKenzie K (2024) Exploring the accuracy of the online version of the Learning Disability Screening Questionnaire. Learning Disability Practice. doi: 10.7748/ldp.2024.e2244

Published online: 11 July 2024

Want to read more?

RCNi-Plus
Already have access? Log in

or

3-month trial offer for £5.25/month

Subscribe today and save 50% on your first three months
RCNi Plus users have full access to the following benefits:
  • Unlimited access to all 10 RCNi Journals
  • RCNi Learning featuring over 175 modules to easily earn CPD time
  • NMC-compliant RCNi Revalidation Portfolio to stay on track with your progress
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
  • A customisable dashboard with over 200 topics
Subscribe

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now


Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you.
Find out more