Potentially avoidable tetanus booster in the emergency department: a service evaluation
Intended for healthcare professionals
Evidence and practice    

Potentially avoidable tetanus booster in the emergency department: a service evaluation

Paul McColgan Advanced clinical practitioner, Defence Medical Services, Joint Hospital Group South West, Plymouth, England

Why you should read this article:
  • To understand that accurate risk assessment of patients who present to emergency departments (EDs) with a laceration, wound or bite is vital to identify tetanus prone wounds and administer prophylactic treatment

  • To learn why many of the prophylactic tetanus treatments administered in EDs may be unnecessary

  • To reflect on why healthcare teams in EDs may be contributing unwittingly to administering avoidable tetanus prophylaxis

Tetanus infection is caused by the Clostridium tetani bacterium, which can enter the body through a wound or puncture in the skin. Patients who present to an emergency department (ED) with a laceration, wound or bite require a risk assessment to determine whether the wound is clean, tetanus prone or high-risk tetanus prone. Those assessed as tetanus prone or high-risk tetanus prone, with an uncertain or inadequate immunisation history, should receive tetanus prophylaxis treatment. However, some patients receive this treatment unnecessarily. This article describes a service evaluation that explored whether practice in one ED was contributing to potentially avoidable tetanus prophylaxis treatment. The article outlines the results of a five-year retrospective database review, which determined that 18% of all tetanus prophylaxis treatments delivered in the ED during that period were unnecessary. The author makes some recommendations to improve practice.

Emergency Nurse. doi: 10.7748/en.2023.e2149

Peer review

This article has been subject to external double-blind peer review and checked for plagiarism using automated software

@P_McColgan

Correspondence

Paul.McColgan432@mod.gov.uk

Conflict of interest

None declared

McColgan P (2023) Potentially avoidable tetanus booster in the emergency department: a service evaluation. Emergency Nurse. doi: 10.7748/en.2023.e2149

Published online: 19 January 2023

Want to read more?

Already subscribed? Log in

OR

Unlock full access to RCNi Plus today

Save over 50% on your first 3 months

Your subscription package includes:
  • Unlimited online access to all 10 RCNi Journals and their archives
  • Customisable dashboard featuring 200+ topics
  • RCNi Learning featuring 180+ RCN accredited learning modules
  • RCNi Portfolio to build evidence for revalidation
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
Subscribe
RCN student member? Try Nursing Standard Student

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now

Or