First do no harm: Parental exclusion from anaesthetic rooms
Intended for healthcare professionals
Clinical family-centred care Previous     Next

First do no harm: Parental exclusion from anaesthetic rooms

Edward Alan Glasper Professor, Academic Head of Child Health Studies, University of Southampton;
Catherine Powell Lecturer, University of Southampton

Alan Glasper and Catherine Powell review the evidence and conclude that excluding parents from anaesthetic rooms may contradict the principles of clinical governance and compromise the rights of children and their parents

The intention of this paper is to reappraise the evidence base supporting parental presence in the anaesthetic room. A review of the literature includes reference to a study undertaken by one of the authors (EAG) that clearly demonstrated the beneficial effects of parental presence to the child. Despite this, anecdotal evidence is emerging which suggests that a growing number of parents are excluded at a time when their reassuring presence may be fundamentally important to the psychological well-being of their child.

Nursing Children and Young People. 12, 4, 14-17. doi: 10.7748/paed.12.4.14.s19

Want to read more?

RCNi-Plus
Already have access? Log in

or

3-month trial offer for £5.25/month

Subscribe today and save 50% on your first three months
RCNi Plus users have full access to the following benefits:
  • Unlimited access to all 10 RCNi Journals
  • RCNi Learning featuring over 175 modules to easily earn CPD time
  • NMC-compliant RCNi Revalidation Portfolio to stay on track with your progress
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
  • A customisable dashboard with over 200 topics
Subscribe

Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you.
Find out more