Black African and black Caribbean men’s understanding and experiences of prostate cancer post-treatment in England: a qualitative study
Intended for healthcare professionals
Evidence and practice    

Black African and black Caribbean men’s understanding and experiences of prostate cancer post-treatment in England: a qualitative study

Obrey Alexis Senior lecturer, Oxford Brookes University, Swindon, Wiltshire, England

Aim Black African and black Caribbean men are two to three times more likely to be diagnosed with prostate cancer compared with white men, and some appear to have little knowledge of the disease. The aim of this study was to examine black African and black Caribbean men’s understanding and experience of prostate cancer post-treatment and to create a video to raise awareness in the African and Caribbean communities of the importance of testing.

Method In total 20 black African and black Caribbean men were interviewed using a qualitative approach and the data were analysed thematically.

Findings There was a lack of knowledge and understanding of prostate cancer among the study sample, who were also sometimes exposed to misinformation within the black community, including herbal remedies. Some participants believed their racial features were a barrier to the way in which limited information was shared with them by healthcare professionals.

Conclusion There is a need to raise awareness about prostate cancer in black communities to educate men about the disease and its effects. Additionally, evidence-based information about the disease is required to educate black men and to reduce the effects of misinformation and herbal remedies on their well-being. In the health sector, unconscious bias should be recognised, addressed and avoided to ensure inclusive and person-centred care regardless of ethnicity.

Cancer Nursing Practice. 19, 6, 31-36. doi: 10.7748/cnp.2020.e1732

Correspondence

oalexis@brookes.ac.uk

Peer review

This article has been subject to external double-blind peer review and has been checked for plagiarism using automated software

Conflict of interest

None declared

Permission

To reuse this article or for information about reprints and permissions, please contact permissions@rcni.com

Write for us

For information about writing for RCNi journals, contact writeforus@rcni.com

For author guidelines, go to rcni.com/writeforus

Want to read more?

RCNi-Plus
Already have access? Log in

or

3-month trial offer for £5.25/month

Subscribe today and save 50% on your first three months
RCNi Plus users have full access to the following benefits:
  • Unlimited access to all 10 RCNi Journals
  • RCNi Learning featuring over 175 modules to easily earn CPD time
  • NMC-compliant RCNi Revalidation Portfolio to stay on track with your progress
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
  • A customisable dashboard with over 200 topics
Subscribe

Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you.
Find out more