Exploring the effectiveness of digital technology to support patients with adrenal incidentaloma: a literature review
Intended for healthcare professionals
Evidence & Practice    

Exploring the effectiveness of digital technology to support patients with adrenal incidentaloma: a literature review

Ideh Kont @IdehKont Senior nurse, PhD candidate, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust/Staffordshire University, England
Fahmy Hanna Consultant/honorary professor endocrinology and metabolism, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust/Staffordshire University
Mohammad Hasan Senior lecturer, School of Digital, Technologies and Arts, Staffordshire University, England
Wilfred McSherry Professor in nursing, Department of Nursing, School of Health and Social Care, Staffordshire University/University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, England, and professor, VID University College, Bergen, Norway

An adrenal incidentaloma is a mass discovered on the adrenal glands when patients have an investigative scan for an unrelated reason, and is considered a long-term condition. Online resources for people with other long-term conditions can provide information and advice on self-management, which can reduce their stress and anxiety.

This article reports findings of a literature review on the effectiveness of using digital technology and digital communication methods to support patients newly diagnosed with a long-term condition. No evidence was found on this topic in relation to adrenal incidentaloma, so the literature on other long-term conditions – specifically cancer, diabetes mellitus and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) – was reviewed.

The article suggests that, despite the limited data on digital technology to support newly diagnosed patients with adrenal incidentaloma, online and web-based information and support programmes are used successfully for patients with other long-term conditions. Therefore, these programmes could be adapted or developed for this patient group.

Cancer Nursing Practice. 20, 1, 29-35. doi: 10.7748/cnp.2020.e1720

Correspondence

ideh.kont@uhns.nhs.uk

Peer review

This article has been subject to external double-blind peer review and has been checked for plagiarism using automated software

Conflict of interest

None declared

Permission

To reuse this article or for information about reprints and permissions, please contact permissions@rcni.com

Write for us

For information about writing for RCNi journals, contact writeforus@rcni.com

For author guidelines, go to rcni.com/writeforus

Want to read more?

RCNi-Plus
Already have access? Log in

or

3-month trial offer for £5.25/month

Subscribe today and save 50% on your first three months
RCNi Plus users have full access to the following benefits:
  • Unlimited access to all 10 RCNi Journals
  • RCNi Learning featuring over 175 modules to easily earn CPD time
  • NMC-compliant RCNi Revalidation Portfolio to stay on track with your progress
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
  • A customisable dashboard with over 200 topics
Subscribe

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now


Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you.
Find out more