Use of glycated haemoglobin blood test (HbA1c) screening for health promotion in surgical gynaecology oncology patients
Intended for healthcare professionals
Evidence and practice    

Use of glycated haemoglobin blood test (HbA1c) screening for health promotion in surgical gynaecology oncology patients

Margaret Ryan Macmillan gynaecology clinical nurse specialist, Gynaecological oncology surgery, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England
Laura Bradley Macmillan gynaecology clinical nurse specialist, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England
Maria Kikayi Macmillan gynaecology clinical nurse specialist, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England
Sarah Gallagher Macmillan gynaecology clinical nurse specialist, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England
Jennifer Bartrop Gynaecology clinical nurse specialist, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England

High body mass index (BMI) is a common risk factor for type 2 diabetes and many cancers, and the increasing prevalence of undiagnosed type 2 diabetes and high BMI affect patients’ outcomes. The surgical gynaecology clinical nurse specialist (CNS) team at The Christie NHS Foundation Trust identified that patients referred to their service might benefit from a glycated haemoglobin blood test (HbA1c) test as well as the other standard pre-operative blood tests.

The aim was to enable early identification of patients who required monitoring and intervention of their glucose levels in the preoperative period to reduce potential complications. Additionally, the results could be used to identify those who may be suitable for health promotion interventions.

This article discusses some of the negative effects of obesity and shares findings following the introduction of this screening, which show that 4% of patients had undiagnosed diabetes and 21% had impaired glucose regulation. It also describes the actions taken in response to these results, which included interventions such as lifestyle advice and monitoring.

Cancer Nursing Practice. 18, 6, 28-31. doi: 10.7748/cnp.2019.e1592

Correspondence

margaret.ryan@christie.nhs.uk

Peer review

This article has been subject to external double-blind peer review and has been checked for plagiarism using automated software

Conflict of interest

None declared

Permission

To reuse this article or for information about reprints and permissions, please contact permissions@rcni.com

Write for us

For information about writing for RCNi journals, contact writeforus@rcni.com

For author guidelines, go to rcni.com/writeforus

Want to read more?

RCNi-Plus
Already have access? Log in

or

3-month trial offer for £5.25/month

Subscribe today and save 50% on your first three months
RCNi Plus users have full access to the following benefits:
  • Unlimited access to all 10 RCNi Journals
  • RCNi Learning featuring over 175 modules to easily earn CPD time
  • NMC-compliant RCNi Revalidation Portfolio to stay on track with your progress
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
  • A customisable dashboard with over 200 topics
Subscribe

Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you.
Find out more