Responsive assessment of clinical competence: part 2
Mary Neary Professional Tutor, School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University
Aim To highlight the concerns that students and practitioners might have about the process of assessment of their nursing practice, and to suggest an alternative method.
Method Questionnaires were given to 300 student nurses and 155 nurse practitioners throughout a Common Foundation Programme and interviews were conducted with 70 students and 80 assessors from three colleges of nursing.
Results Although students generally favoured structured assessment of their progress, they would like some flexibility. Students acknowledged stress caused by continuous assessment. Assessment of clinical competence was seen to be as important as academic assessment. It was felt that time should be allowed to discuss progress during and after practical experience. Students appreciated the need for continuous assessment, but favoured a change in the way assessment booklets were used.
Conclusion The author suggests a new concept of continuous assessment of students of nursing clinical competence. This new model is called responsive assessment, in which the assessment process focuses on the worth and merit of the care given by students to clients/patients, as well as set learning objectives.
15, 10, 35-40.
Want to read more?
Subscribe for unlimited access
Try 1 month’s access for just £1 and get:
Your subscription package includes:
- Full access to nursingstandard.com and the Nursing Standard app
- The monthly digital edition
- RCNi Portfolio and interactive CPD quizzes
- RCNi Learning with 200+ evidence-based modules
- 10 articles a month from any other RCNi journal
Already subscribed? Log in
Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now