• To update your knowledge of the latest evidence regarding artificial hydration at the end of life
• To enhance your awareness of the benefits and risks associated with the use of artificial hydration at the end of life
• To understand the ethical issues and family concerns related to the withdrawal or withholding of artificial hydration in patients who are dying
There is a lack of clear evidence regarding the benefits and harm of artificial hydration at the end of life. Trial findings are conflicting and inconclusive, offering little basis for recommendations. As a result, the advantages and disadvantages of artificial hydration remain largely anecdotal, and decisions about its use, withholding or withdrawal are often based on opinion rather than evidence. In certain circumstances, some patients who are dying might derive benefit from artificial hydration in terms of reducing specific symptoms, such as delirium. This article explores the central questions pertaining to artificial hydration at the end of life by undertaking a critical exploration of the relevant literature.
Nursing Standard. doi: 10.7748/ns.2020.e11595
Peer reviewThis article has been subject to external double-blind peer review and has been checked for plagiarism using automated software
Correspondence Conflict of interestNone declared
Beland P (2020) Artificial hydration at the end of life: balancing benefits and risks in the absence of conclusive evidence. Nursing Standard. doi: 10.7748/ns.2020.e11595
Published online: 02 September 2020
or
Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now
Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you.
Find out more