The value of artefacts in stimulated-recall interviews
Mixed methods Previous     Next

The value of artefacts in stimulated-recall interviews

Sarah Burden Senior lecturer in nursing, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, West Yorkshire, UK
Annie Topping Assistant executive director of Nursing, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
Catherine O’Halloran Associate dean, external relations, human and health sciences, University of Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK

Aim To assess the use of artefacts in semi-structured, stimulated-recall interviews in a study exploring mentors’ decisions regarding students’ competence in practice.

Background Few empirical studies have examined how mentors reach a decision when assessing students’ performance in practice. Concerns have repeatedly been voiced that students may lack essential skills at the point of registration or that mentors may have failed or been reticent to judge students’ performance as unsatisfactory.

Data sources Student practice assessment documents (PADs) were used in stimulated-recall (SR) interviews with mentors to explore decision making.

Review methods A review of the literature identified that artefacts can play a role in triggering a more comprehensive retrospective examination of decision making, thus helping to capture the essence of a mentor’s decision over time and in context.

Discussion Use of an artefact to stimulate recall can elicit evidence of thought processes, which may be difficult to obtain in a normal, semi-structured interview. PADs proved to be a valuable way to generate naturalistic decision making. In addition, discussion of artefacts created by participants can promote participant-driven enquiry, thereby reducing researcher bias.

Conclusion Identifying an approach that captures post hoc decision making based on sustained engagement and interaction between students and their mentors was a challenge. Artefacts can be used to address the difficulties associated with retrospective introspection about a unique decision.

Implications for practice/research There is the potential to increase the use of artefacts in healthcare research. SR can also help novice mentors develop their skills in making decisions regarding assessments of students.

Nurse Researcher. 23, 1, 26-33. doi: 10.7748/nr.23.1.26.e1324


Peer review

This article has been subject to double-blind review and has been checked using antiplagiarism software

Conflict of interest

None declared

Received: 13 June 2014

Accepted: 08 August 2015

Want to read more?

Already subscribed? Log in


Unlock full access to RCNi Plus today

Save over 50% on your first 3 months

Your subscription package includes:
  • Unlimited online access to all 10 RCNi Journals and their archives
  • Customisable dashboard featuring 200+ topics
  • RCNi Learning featuring 180+ RCN accredited learning modules
  • RCNi Portfolio to build evidence for revalidation
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
RCN student member? Try Nursing Standard Student

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now