Researcher or nurse? Difficulties of undertaking semi-structured interviews on sensitive topics
Intended for healthcare professionals
Role conflict Previous     Next

Researcher or nurse? Difficulties of undertaking semi-structured interviews on sensitive topics

Susan Ashton Senior lecturer, Liverpool John Moores University, faculty of health and applied social sciences Liverpool, UK

Aim To reflect on the author’s personal and professional journey when undertaking semi-structured interviews on sensitive topics with potentially vulnerable people.

Background When discussing care at the end of life, researchers must accept that some participants may become distressed or emotional, depending on their previous experiences. Interviews that involve sensitive topics require careful planning.

Data sources The semi-structured interviews were conducted as part of the author’s PhD study examining the experiences of advance care planning among family caregivers of people with advanced dementia.

Review methods A reflection on my personal and professional journey when undertaking semi-structured interviews on sensitive topics with potentially vulnerable people.

Discussion The frustration and tragedy of dementia, as experienced by the family caregivers, were powerful and required the author to exert self-control to avoid being overly sympathetic and offering words of reassurance, agreement and comfort.

Conclusion This blurring of roles between researcher and nurse has implications for all nurse researchers who undertake qualitative interviews, particularly when an intense emotional response is likely.

Implications for research/practice Nurse researchers should plan and prepare for potential blurring of roles during emotional interviews and should never automatically assume that they are sufficiently prepared as a result of their previous experience and nurse training.

Nurse Researcher. 22, 1, 27-31. doi: 10.7748/nr.22.1.27.e1255

Correspondence

s.e.ashton@ljmu.ac.uk

Peer review

This article has been subject to double blind peer review

Conflict of interest

None declared

Received: 11 June 2013

Accepted: 28 August 2013

Want to read more?

RCNi-Plus
Already have access? Log in

or

3-month trial offer for £5.25/month

Subscribe today and save 50% on your first three months
RCNi Plus users have full access to the following benefits:
  • Unlimited access to all 10 RCNi Journals
  • RCNi Learning featuring over 175 modules to easily earn CPD time
  • NMC-compliant RCNi Revalidation Portfolio to stay on track with your progress
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
  • A customisable dashboard with over 200 topics
Subscribe

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now


Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you.
Find out more