Mixed-methods study to develop a patient complexity assessment instrument for district nurses
Instrument development Previous     Next

Mixed-methods study to develop a patient complexity assessment instrument for district nurses

Susan J Thomas PhD student and RCBC fellow, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, UK
Carolyn Wallace Reader in integrated care, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, UK
Paul Jarvis Lecturer, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, UK
Ruth Elizabeth Davis Lecturer, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, UK

Background There is increasing reference to complex patient needs in health care. However, little is known about how to measure patient complexity or the relationship between it and district nursing activity.

Aim To illustrate the use of group concept mapping (GCM) to conceptualise and develop items for a patient complexity assessment instrument to be used by district nurses.

Discussion The first phase of this research used GCM conceptualisation and consensus methodology to identify items for a community-based patient complexity instrument. GCM helped to provide a conceptual understanding of community-based patient complexity through focused exploration of the term.

Results indicated that a number of environmental, sociological, psychological, behavioural, physical and organisational factors needed to be included. This, in turn, showed that an existing taxonomy did not contain the relevant items. Consequently, amendments were made and a new instrument developed.

Conclusion GCM is a suitable consensus method for use in nursing theory and developing instruments. It proved successful in achieving consensus with no loss of participants’ views.

Implications for practice GCM is a suitable method for nurses to use in research or practice development activities as it is based on a facilitative and engagement-led approach.

Nurse Researcher. 23, 4, 9-13. doi: 10.7748/nr.23.4.9.s3

Correspondence

sue.thomas@southwales.ac.uk

Peer review

This article has been subject to double-blind review and has been checked using antiplagiarism software

Conflict of interest

None declared

Received: 11 June 2015

Accepted: 07 September 2015

Want to read more?

Subscribe for unlimited access

Try 1 month’s access for just £1 and get:

Your subscription package includes:
  • Full access to the website and the online archive
  • Quaterly digital edition
  • RCNi Portfolio and interactive CPD quizzes
  • RCNi Learning with 200+ evidence-based modules
  • 10 articles a month from any other RCNi journal
Subscribe
RCN student member? Try Nursing Standard Student
Already subscribed? Log in

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now

Or