Involving young people as co-researchers in a photography project
General Previous     Next

Involving young people as co-researchers in a photography project

Jane Coad Professor, Children and family nursing at the Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Coventry University, UK

Aim To reflect on involving young people as co-researchers in a photography project in England.

Background The literature includes many different approaches to engaging with young people, seeking their views about health issues and involving them in research projects. Using young people as co-researchers brings with it ethical and methodological challenges.

Data sources A photography project with the author that elicited the views of young people aged 13 to 17 to explore their health beliefs.

Review methods A critical reflective account is included to highlight the important issues related to involving young people as co-researchers, especially those associated with data collation and analysis such as the balance of power between adults and young people in decision making, and the importance of training, support, ethical considerations, time and resources.

Discussion How young people can be involved in the iterative process of data collection and analysis to inform the study with their greater understanding of their peers’ perspectives.

Conclusion The young people involved in the study were enthusiastic and readily engaged in the photography workshops and process. If researchers are to help young people to participate in projects as co-researchers, they must give full consideration to their involvement in all stages of research.

Implications for practice/research Time and resources need to be built into the bid process and from the start of planning. There are challenges to involving young people as co-researchers that need to be overcome, such as resistance from academic institutions, health professionals, sponsors and/or other professional researchers.

Nurse Researcher. 19, 2, 11-16. doi: 10.7748/nr2012.01.19.2.11.c8903

Peer review

This article has been subject to double blind peer review

Conflict of interest

None declared

Want to read more?

Already subscribed? Log in

OR

Unlock full access to RCNi Plus today

Save over 50% on your first 3 months

Your subscription package includes:
  • Unlimited online access to all 10 RCNi Journals and their archives
  • Customisable dashboard featuring 200+ topics
  • RCNi Learning featuring 180+ RCN accredited learning modules
  • RCNi Portfolio to build evidence for revalidation
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
Subscribe
RCN student member? Try Nursing Standard Student

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now

Or