Using naturalistic inquiry to inform qualitative description
Intended for healthcare professionals
Evidence and practice    

Using naturalistic inquiry to inform qualitative description

Natalie Ann Cutler PhD candidate, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
Elizabeth Halcomb Professor of primary health care nursing, School of Nursing, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
Jenny Sim Senior lecturer, School of Nursing, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia

Why you should read this article:
  • To assist in the choice of an appropriate design to answer a research question

  • To help novice researchers make considered choices about how their research questions align with available methodologies and methods

  • To understand the alignment between qualitative descriptive methodology and naturalistic inquiry

Background Choosing how to answer a research question requires an understanding of philosophical and theoretical assumptions and how these inform a study’s methodology and methods. This can be a challenge for all researchers, but for novice researchers, such as doctoral candidates, this can feel like an overwhelming task. Ensuring there is clear alignment between philosophy, theory, methodology and methods is an essential part of the research process, that enables research to be undertaken with clarity and integrity. This alignment must be a good fit for the research aim, and to ensure the researcher’s intrinsic values and beliefs do not affect the analysis undertaken.

Aim To describe the alignment between qualitative description and naturalistic inquiry and how it was applied to a doctoral candidate’s exploration of the meaning of safety for people with experience of admission to an acute mental health unit.

Discussion Understanding the alignment between qualitative descriptive methodology and naturalistic inquiry provided a clear pathway for the doctoral candidate.

Conclusion The assumptions that underpin a methodological approach need to be unpacked to understand how to answer a research question effectively.

Implications for practice Qualitative description, informed by naturalistic inquiry, offers a practical way to explore and answer research questions.

Nurse Researcher. 29, 3, 29-33. doi: 10.7748/nr.2021.e1788

Correspondence

nac639@uowmail.edu.au

Peer review

This article has been subject to external double-blind peer review and has been checked for plagiarism using automated software

Conflict of interest

None declared

Permission

To reuse this article or for information about reprints and permissions, please contact permissions@rcni.com

Write for us

For information about writing for RCNi journals, contact writeforus@rcni.com

For author guidelines, go to rcni.com/write-for-nurse-researcher

Want to read more?

RCNi-Plus
Already have access? Log in

or

3-month trial offer for £5.25/month

Subscribe today and save 50% on your first three months
RCNi Plus users have full access to the following benefits:
  • Unlimited access to all 10 RCNi Journals
  • RCNi Learning featuring over 175 modules to easily earn CPD time
  • NMC-compliant RCNi Revalidation Portfolio to stay on track with your progress
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
  • A customisable dashboard with over 200 topics
Subscribe

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now


Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you.
Find out more