Reflections on developing a conceptual framework to support a constructivist grounded theory study on compassion in nursing
Intended for healthcare professionals
Evidence & Practice    

Reflections on developing a conceptual framework to support a constructivist grounded theory study on compassion in nursing

Collette Straughair Senior lecturer, Adult nursing, Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Northumbria University, Coach Lane Campus, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England

Background Developing a conceptual framework to underpin the design of qualitative research is often regarded as integral in enhancing its trustworthiness. However, this can often present a challenge to the novice researcher.

Aim To discuss the approach taken to develop the conceptual framework underpinning a constructivist grounded theory doctoral research study.

Discussion Drawing on a clear and accessible approach can help researchers to develop a conceptual framework to underpin qualitative research. A recognised example of such an approach requires the researcher to address three main elements: personal interest, topical research and the theoretical framework. Constructing a conceptual framework to underpin qualitative research can afford it structure and lay the foundations to support trustworthiness. Conceptual frameworks are often developed through a dynamic and iterative process that evolves throughout the research process.

Conclusion Using an accessible and unambiguous approach to support the development of a conceptual framework can benefit novice researchers and minimise the challenges they may encounter. One such approach guides researchers to clarify a personal interest in the topic, undertake a topical review of the literature informing the area of investigation and articulate the theoretical perspectives that influence their worldview.

Implications for practice The discussion presented in this paper offers a valuable contribution to help novice researchers to construct conceptual frameworks.

Nurse Researcher. 27, 1, 22-26. doi: 10.7748/nr.2019.e1621

Correspondence

c.straughair@northumbria.ac.uk

Peer review

This article has been subject to external double-blind peer review and has been checked for plagiarism using automated software

Conflict of interest

None declared

Permission

To reuse this article or for information about reprints and permissions, please contact permissions@rcni.com

Write for us

For information about writing for RCNi journals, contact writeforus@rcni.com

For author guidelines, go to rcni.com/write-for-nurse-researcher

Want to read more?

RCNi-Plus
Already have access? Log in

or

3-month trial offer for £5.25/month

Subscribe today and save 50% on your first three months
RCNi Plus users have full access to the following benefits:
  • Unlimited access to all 10 RCNi Journals
  • RCNi Learning featuring over 175 modules to easily earn CPD time
  • NMC-compliant RCNi Revalidation Portfolio to stay on track with your progress
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
  • A customisable dashboard with over 200 topics
Subscribe

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now


Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you.
Find out more