Misclassification and measurement error – planning a study and interpreting results
evidence and practice    

Misclassification and measurement error – planning a study and interpreting results

Steven Alfred Frost Deputy Director, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Centre for Applied Nursing Research, Liverpool BC, New South Wales, Australia
Evan Alexandrou Associate Professor, School of Nursing, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia

Why you should read this article:
  • Measurement error must always be considered when planning a research project and interpreting its results

  • Little attention has been given in nursing research training to misclassification and measurement errors

  • Ignoring measurement error will result in flawed interpretation and application of study results to clinical practice

Background Measurement error must always be considered when planning a research project and interpreting its results. The accuracy of some data collected during a study can often be confidently assured, but more than one measurement or observer is needed to assess exposure and outcomes status in cases where clinical measurement is prone to measurement error. Little attention is paid in nursing research to misclassification and measurement error. Bias is often discussed in nursing research education, but not its potential consequences or measures that can be taken to improve the study’s quality.

Aim To present examples of random measurement error – misclassification of a binary outcome – in a continuous exposure and outcomes variable, to address this gap in nurses’ research training.

Discussion The article discusses the relationship between exposure and outcome in the absence and presence of measurement error using risk (relative risk) and association using correlation. It provides methods to estimate the true value of these measures of risk and association, when only given the clinical measurements with errors.

Conclusion If the assumption of random error holds, attenuation of risk or association towards the null will occur.

Implications for practice Understanding the effect of measurement error including misclassification will enable researchers to interpret the results of their studies, and to take into consideration this potential error when planning and conducting a study.

Nurse Researcher. doi: 10.7748/nr.2021.e1765

Peer review

This article has been subject to external double-blind peer review and has been checked for plagiarism using automated software

Correspondence

s.frost@westernsydney.edu.au

Conflict of interest

None declared

Frost SA, Alexandrou E (2021) Misclassification and measurement error – planning a study and interpreting results. Nurse Researcher. doi: 10.7748/nr.2021.e1765

Published online: 07 January 2021

Want to read more?

Subscribe for unlimited access

Try 1 month’s access for just £1 and get:

Your subscription package includes:
  • Full access to the website and the online archive
  • Quaterly digital edition
  • RCNi Portfolio and interactive CPD quizzes
  • RCNi Learning with 200+ evidence-based modules
  • 10 articles a month from any other RCNi journal
Subscribe
RCN student member? Try Nursing Standard Student
Already subscribed? Log in

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now

Or