Developing a national mentorship scheme to enhance the contribution of clinical academics to health care
Practitioner research Previous     Next

Developing a national mentorship scheme to enhance the contribution of clinical academics to health care

Geraldine Byrne Principal lecturer, School of Health and Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
Annie Topping Professor of nursing, Centre for Health & Social Care Research, University of Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK
Sally Kendall Professor of nursing, Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
Berenice Golding Research assistant, School of Health and Human Science, University of Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK

Aim To provide a template for developing a national mentoring scheme to enhance the contribution practitioner researchers can make to the quality of health care in England.

Background The authors describe the background to and organisation of a mentorship scheme to support those awarded National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) fellowships as part of the Clinical Academic Training (CAT) scheme for nurses, midwives and the allied health professionals in England.

Data sources The paper draws on relevant policy documents to explain the development of the NIHR mentorship scheme. It also reviews the literature regarding mentoring in nursing and the health professions.

Review methods The review was conducted systematically using keywords: mentorship, clinical academic careers, research, nursing research, clinical academic careers, evidence, health care. Databases included PubMed, CINAHL and Google Scholar. An integrated approach was adopted.

Discussion Kirkpatrick’s (2006) four-level evaluation model provided a framework to evaluate the scheme and explore the role of mentorship in supporting NIHR fellows. Preliminary findings from baseline and end-of-year evaluations revealed mentees’ expectations of mentorship and its effects on their professional development. Developing a career as a clinical academic can be a challenging journey for novice researchers. In addition, there is a vital need to integrate research with clinical practice.

Conclusion Mentoring appears valuable in enabling NIHR fellows to navigate the challenges of demanding clinical roles in England’s National Health Service while making a high-level contribution to research. The importance of preparing mentors for their role is well documented in the literature but mentees also need preparation and guidance to manage this important relationship.

Implications for research/practice The evaluation has implications for embedding similar schemes across nursing, midwifery and the allied health professions to promote capacity and leadership in clinical academic careers. This study has uniquely identified the need to support mentees as well as mentors in such programmes to ensure the optimal benefit of the programme reaches all participants.

Nurse Researcher. 22, 2, 23-28. doi: 10.7748/nr.22.2.23.e1288

Peer review

This article has been subject to double blind peer review

Conflict of interest

None declared

Received: 16 October 2013

Accepted: 11 December 2013

Want to read more?

Already subscribed? Log in

OR

Unlock full access to RCNi Plus today

Save over 50% on your first 3 months

Your subscription package includes:
  • Unlimited online access to all 10 RCNi Journals and their archives
  • Customisable dashboard featuring 200+ topics
  • RCNi Learning featuring 180+ RCN accredited learning modules
  • RCNi Portfolio to build evidence for revalidation
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
Subscribe
RCN student member? Try Nursing Standard Student

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now

Or