Clinical and research databases in healthcare research
Jill Firth Smith and Nephew Foundation post doctoral research fellow, School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, UK
Naomi Reay Doctoral student, School of Healthcare/School of Medicine, University of Leeds, UK
How reliable are databases as a source of potential participants for research? Jill Firth and Naomi Reay suggest that caution is required
This paper reports on the experiences of two nurse researchers sampling from clinical and research databases for the purpose of research. The authors focus on their practical experiences of using databases to identify potential participants for research, and explore the implications for conduct of research and potential impact on response rates and analysis of non-response bias. The Records Management: NHS Code of Practice (Department of Health (DH) 2006) and its implications for the creation and maintenance of records, including databases, are covered comprehensively in another article by Reay and Firth (2008).
15, 4, 27-34.
Want to read more?
Already subscribed? Log in
Unlock full access to RCNi Plus today
Save over 50% on your first 3 months
Your subscription package includes:
- Unlimited online access to all 10 RCNi Journals and their archives
- Customisable dashboard featuring 200+ topics
- RCNi Learning featuring 180+ RCN accredited learning modules
- RCNi Portfolio to build evidence for revalidation
- Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now