Challenges in accessing and interviewing participants with severe mental illness
Daniel Newman PhD student, Department of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Ireland
Pauline O’Reilly Head, Department of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Ireland
Siew Hwa Lee Lecturer, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, Scotland
Catriona Kennedy Professor of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, Scotland
Background Interviews are widely used in qualitative research to collect data. However, little has been written about interviewing people with severe mental illness (SMI).
Aim To report and analyse an experience of addressing the ethical and practical challenges of interviewing people with SMI.
Discussion Semi-structured interviews were conducted as part of a doctoral study to explore how service users and healthcare professionals built relationships with each other.
Conclusion Although interviewing participants with SMI was challenging, rich data illustrating their experiences were gathered. Careful planning around ethical considerations, such as obtaining informed consent, was required to maximise the opportunities to gather in-depth information during the interviews. The relationship established between researcher and the participants assisted with sensitive disclosures and allowed participants to tell their stories.
Implications for research This paper provides strategies to help guide researchers planning interviews with vulnerable populations, including those with SMI. These strategies include how to discuss sensitive issues and promote engagement. Listening to participants’ life stories is an intense experience, requiring support for the interviewer to stay neutral during interviews. It is also important to be aware of the differences between the roles of nurse and nurse researcher before undertaking in-depth qualitative interviews, particularly with vulnerable participants.
25, 1, 37-42.
This article has been subject to double-blind review and has been checked for plagiarism using automated software
Conflict of interest
Received: 03 November 2015
Accepted: 09 November 2016
Want to read more?
Subscribe for unlimited access
Try 1 month’s access for just £1 and get:
Your subscription package includes:
- Full access to the website and the online archive
- Quaterly digital edition
- RCNi Portfolio and interactive CPD quizzes
- RCNi Learning with 200+ evidence-based modules
- 10 articles a month from any other RCNi journal
Already subscribed? Log in
Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now