Breaking from binaries – using a sequential mixed methods design
Mixed methods Previous     Next

Breaking from binaries – using a sequential mixed methods design

Patricia Mary Larkin Lecturer in midwifery, School of Health and Science, Dundalk Institute of Technology, Republic of Ireland
Cecily Marion Begley Professor, Trinity College Dublin, Republic of Ireland
Declan Devane Chair of midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Republic of Ireland

Aim To outline the traditional worldviews of healthcare research and discuss the benefits and challenges of using mixed methods approaches in contributing to the development of nursing and midwifery knowledge.

Background There has been much debate about the contribution of mixed methods research to nursing and midwifery knowledge in recent years.

Data sources A sequential exploratory design is used as an exemplar of a mixed methods approach. The study discussed used a combination of focus-group interviews and a quantitative instrument to obtain a fuller understanding of women’s experiences of childbirth.

Review methods In the mixed methods study example, qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis and quantitative data using regression analysis.

Discussion Polarised debates about the veracity, philosophical integrity and motivation for conducting mixed methods research have largely abated. A mixed methods approach can contribute to a deeper, more contextual understanding of a variety of subjects and experiences; as a result, it furthers knowledge that can be used in clinical practice.

Conclusion The purpose of the research study should be the main instigator when choosing from an array of mixed methods research designs. Mixed methods research offers a variety of models that can augment investigative capabilities and provide richer data than can a discrete method alone.

Implications for practice/research This paper offers an example of an exploratory, sequential approach to investigating women’s childbirth experiences. A clear framework for the conduct and integration of the different phases of the mixed methods research process is provided. This approach can be used by practitioners and policy makers to improve practice.

Nurse Researcher. 21, 4, 8-12. doi: 10.7748/nr2014.

Peer review

This article has been subject to double blind peer review

Conflict of interest

None declared

Received: 03 January 2013

Accepted: 03 June 2013

Want to read more?

Already subscribed? Log in


Unlock full access to RCNi Plus today

Save over 50% on your first 3 months

Your subscription package includes:
  • Unlimited online access to all 10 RCNi Journals and their archives
  • Customisable dashboard featuring 200+ topics
  • RCNi Learning featuring 180+ RCN accredited learning modules
  • RCNi Portfolio to build evidence for revalidation
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
RCN student member? Try Nursing Standard Student

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now