Bracketing as a skill in conducting unstructured qualitative interviews
Minna Anneli Sorsa Co-ordinator, Pirkanmaa Hospital District, Tampere, Finland
Irma Kiikkala Docent in nursing science, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
Päivi Åstedt-Kurki Professor in nursing science, University of Tampere, Pirkanmaa Hospital District, Tampere, Finland
Aim To provide an overview of bracketing as a skill in unstructured qualitative research interviews.
Background Researchers affect the qualitative research process. Bracketing in descriptive phenomenology entails researchers setting aside their pre-understanding and acting non-judgementally. In interpretative phenomenology, previous knowledge is used intentionally to create new understanding.
Data sources A literature search of bracketing in phenomenology and qualitative research.
Review methods This is a methodology paper examining the researchers’ impact in creating data in creating data in qualitative research.
Discussion Self-knowledge, sensitivity and reflexivity of the researcher enable bracketing.
Conclusion Skilled and experienced researchers are needed to use bracketing in unstructured qualitative research interviews.
Implications for research/practice Bracketing adds scientific rigour and validity to any qualitative study.
22, 4, 8-12.
This article has been subject to double blind peer review
Conflict of interest
Received: 11 April 2014
Accepted: 24 June 2014
Want to read more?
Already subscribed? Log in
Unlock full access to RCNi Plus today
Save over 50% on your first 3 months
Your subscription package includes:
- Unlimited online access to all 10 RCNi Journals and their archives
- Customisable dashboard featuring 200+ topics
- RCNi Learning featuring 180+ RCN accredited learning modules
- RCNi Portfolio to build evidence for revalidation
- Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now