Analysing narrative data using McCormack’s Lenses
Intended for healthcare professionals
General Previous     Next

Analysing narrative data using McCormack’s Lenses

Lesley Dibley Research fellow, Faculty of Society and Health, Bucks New University, Uxbridge, UK

Aim In health and social care research, pure naturalistic enquiry often seeks to understand personal experiences, and adopts data collection methods that can generate vast amounts of rich, thick text. This article demonstrates the way in which the author used a particular approach to analyse the complex narrative data arising from her MPhil research into experiences of lesbian parents in the healthcare system.

Background Narrative data is often cumbersome, prolific and chaotic, and it can be difficult to manage such data effectively while remaining sympathetic to the original meaning of the storyteller. Guidance exists on what narrative analysis should achieve, but finding ways of interpreting and demonstrating meaning in different types of stories can be challenging.

Data sources The data discussed here arose from six unstructured interviews with ten lesbian parents from across the UK, collected in 2003-04 during the author’s MPhil studies.

Review methods The use of McCormack’s Lenses to analyse narrative data supported the philosophical underpinnings of Heideggerian phenomenology which provided the framework for the research endeavour.

Discussion Locating the analysis method that best suits the methodology, purpose and data is not always easy. Naturalistic or qualitative researchers may need to make extra effort to explain the philosophical and practical aspects of their work, and while it can be tempting to select an adequate analysis approach, seeking out the framework which best fits the data will enhance the credibility of the findings

Conclusion McCormack’s Lenses provides a flexible framework for the analysis of complex narrative data. It enables the researcher to take core themes and stories of experience in the original story and reveal these to the reader with openness. As well as remaining true to the original story, the framework enables the researcher to demonstrate that the reported findings are situated in the original data.

Nurse Researcher. 18, 3, 13-19. doi: 10.7748/nr2011.04.18.3.13.c8458

Peer review

This article has been subject to double blind peer review

Accepted: 22 January 2010

Want to read more?

RCNi-Plus
Already have access? Log in

or

3-month trial offer for £5.25/month

Subscribe today and save 50% on your first three months
RCNi Plus users have full access to the following benefits:
  • Unlimited access to all 10 RCNi Journals
  • RCNi Learning featuring over 175 modules to easily earn CPD time
  • NMC-compliant RCNi Revalidation Portfolio to stay on track with your progress
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
  • A customisable dashboard with over 200 topics
Subscribe

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now


Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you.
Find out more