‘Today We Talked’: using a collaborative approach to transform care in the psychiatric intensive care unit
Intended for healthcare professionals
Evidence and practice    

‘Today We Talked’: using a collaborative approach to transform care in the psychiatric intensive care unit

Sean Page Consultant nurse (retired), Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Wrexham Maelor Hospital, Wrexham, Wales
Mat Jarvis Ward manager, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Wrexham, Wales
Tony Carr Third sector advocate, Caniad North Wales, Colwyn, Wales
Melanie Williams Third sector advocate, Caniad North Wales, Colwyn, Wales
Rupert Leslie Occupational therapist, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Wrexham, Wales
Denise Charles Regional service manager, Caniad North Wales, Colwyn, Wales
Leanne Gill Ward manager, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Wrexham, Wales
Steve Forsyth Director of mental health nursing, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Wrexham, Wales

People who need care in a psychiatric intensive care unit (PICU) are often highly stigmatised and referred to using negative, dehumanising language, for example being described as ‘difficult’ or ‘problematic’ patients. They have also been described as ‘permanently disturbed’, which shows a lack of respect, value and hope for their recovery.

This article reports on a service development project that aimed to challenge the traditional paradigm of care provided in a PICU in North Wales. The project used the ‘TODAY’ (time, ownership, diagnostics, actions, you) approach as a model for implementing organisational change, which was modified to a more inclusive ‘Today We Talked’ approach. It aimed to involve PICU service users in decision-making about aspects of their care, and to ensure that this care was individualised. Outcomes of the project included reduced use of restrictive physical interventions, reduced stigma, increased opportunities for engagement, improvements in the use of space, increased trust and higher levels of service user satisfaction.

Mental Health Practice. 24, 1, 14-20. doi: 10.7748/mhp.2020.e1503

Correspondence

seanpage_1@yahoo.co.uk

Peer review

This article has been subject to external double-blind peer review and has been checked for plagiarism using automated software

Conflict of interest

None declared

Permission

To reuse this article or for information about reprints and permissions, please contact permissions@rcni.com

Write for us

For information about writing for RCNi journals, contact writeforus@rcni.com

For author guidelines, go to rcni.com/writeforus

RCNi Learning

For related learning modules, go to rcnilearning.com

Want to read more?

RCNi-Plus
Already have access? Log in

or

3-month trial offer for £5.25/month

Subscribe today and save 50% on your first three months
RCNi Plus users have full access to the following benefits:
  • Unlimited access to all 10 RCNi Journals
  • RCNi Learning featuring over 175 modules to easily earn CPD time
  • NMC-compliant RCNi Revalidation Portfolio to stay on track with your progress
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
  • A customisable dashboard with over 200 topics
Subscribe

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now


Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you.
Find out more