Electroconvulsive therapy: why it is still controversial
Art & Science Previous     Next

Electroconvulsive therapy: why it is still controversial

Tomasz Cyrzyk Registered nurse, Greenwich Hospital, Sydney, Australia

Tomasz Cyrzyk looks at how this intervention came to be used to treat patients with severe mental illness, and why it still divides opinion

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is used in modern psychiatry worldwide, but is not fully understood by the general public, practitioners and researchers. Controversy continues to surround its application, the long-term consequences of its use and its legality in the management of the most serious mental illnesses, such as major depression, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia.

After describing the historical roots of ECT, the author provides a description of the main factors that divide opinion on its use today. This appreciation of the different perspectives, and comparison between attitudes in New South Wales, Australia, and in the UK, can inform the debate about this treatment.

Mental Health Practice. 16, 7, 22-27. doi: 10.7748/mhp2013.



Conflict of interest

None declared

Peer review

This article has been subject to double blind peer review

Received: 03 November 2011

Accepted: 25 May 2012

Want to read more?

Subscribe for unlimited access

Try 1 month’s access for just £1 and get:

Your subscription package includes:
  • Full access to the website and the online archive
  • Bi-monthly digital edition
  • RCNi Portfolio and interactive CPD quizzes
  • RCNi Learning with 200+ evidence-based modules
  • 10 articles a month from any other RCNi journal
RCN student member? Try Nursing Standard Student
Already subscribed? Log in

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now