Millfields Charter finding the middle ground
A&S Science Previous     Next

Millfields Charter finding the middle ground

David Leadbetter Director, CALM Training Services

The Millfields Charter has generated much discussion, both for (see pages 229 and against (see pages 30-33) its aims. The following article, by David Leadbetter, was commissioned by Andy McDonnell, director of Studio 3 Training, one the authors of the Millfields Charter. It aims to explore the merits of the respective arguments for and against a ban and, if possible, to identify any common ground in the two contending arguments

To be asked to mediate in a published debate on an important national issue is either a privilege or a poisoned chalice. My therapist will decide. More so where the proponents of the opposing positions are personal friends and colleagues of many years’ standing, both of whom I hold in great respect (Andrew McDonnell and Brodie Paterson). Both have made a huge contribution to the national, and indeed international, debate on restraint safety. Does the task of searching for the middle ground in a debate therefore qualify me for membership of the Liberal Democrat party?

Learning Disability Practice. 10, 3,34-37. doi: 10.7748/ldp2007.

You need a subscription to read the full article