Anne Higgins and Alison Hill discuss how a re-examination of a clinical pathway has improved service provision, education, expertise and support
This article reports the findings of a re-audit across a cancer network of the impact and efficacy of a neutropenic sepsis clinical pathway implemented in 2007. The aims of the audit were to assess patients’ understanding of neutropenic sepsis, their experience of care, staff knowledge of the pathway and the time to administration of antibiotics. The audit was carried out as acute oncology services were being developed. The results showed improvement in patients’ experience, but lack of improvement in time to administration of antibiotics. Further challenges to achieving optimum care are discussed.
Cancer Nursing Practice. 11, 10, 22-27. doi: 10.7748/cnp2012.12.11.10.22.c9473
Correspondence Peer reviewThis article has been subject to double blind peer review
Conflict of interestNone declared
or
Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now
Are you a student? Our student subscription has content especially for you.
Find out more