Methodological and hermeneutic reduction – a study of Finnish multiple-birth families
Reduction Previous     Next

Methodological and hermeneutic reduction – a study of Finnish multiple-birth families

Kristiina Heinonen Teacher of nursing, Savo Vocational College, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland

Aim To describe reduction as a method in methodological and hermeneutic reduction and the hermeneutic circle using van Manen’s principles, with the empirical example of the lifeworlds of multiple-birth families in Finland.

Background Reduction involves several levels that can be distinguished for their methodological usefulness. Researchers can use reduction in different ways and dimensions for their methodological needs.

Data sources Open interviews with public health nurses, family care workers and parents of twins.

Review methods The systematic literature and knowledge review shows there were no articles on multiple-birth families that used van Manen’s method.

Discussion This paper presents reduction as a method that uses the hermeneutic circle. The lifeworlds of multiple-birth families consist of three core themes: ‘A state of constant vigilance’; ‘Ensuring that they can continue to cope’; and ‘Opportunities to share with other people’.

Conclusion Reduction allows us to perform deep phenomenological-hermeneutic research and understand people’s lifeworlds. It helps to keep research stages separate but also enables a consolidated view. Social care and healthcare professionals have to hear parents’ voices better to comprehensively understand their situation; they also need further tools and training to be able to empower parents of twins.

Implications for research/practice The many variations in adapting reduction mean its use can be very complex and confusing. This paper adds to the discussion of phenomenology, hermeneutic study and reduction.

Nurse Researcher. 22, 6, 28-34. doi: 10.7748/nr.22.6.28.e1328

Peer review

This article has been subject to double-blind review and has been checked using antiplagiarism software

Conflict of interest

None declared

Received: 23 June 2014

Accepted: 26 November 2014

Your organisation does not have access to this article
Recommend to your librarian
Already subscribed? Log in


Unlock full access to RCNi Plus today

Save over 50% on your first 3 months

Your subscription package includes:
  • Unlimited online access to all 10 RCNi Journals and their archives
  • Customisable dashboard featuring 200+ topics
  • RCNi Learning featuring 180+ RCN accredited learning modules
  • RCNi Portfolio to build evidence for revalidation
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests