Using a mixed methods grounded theory methodology to explain neonatal nurses’ professional quality of life
Evidence and practice    

Using a mixed methods grounded theory methodology to explain neonatal nurses’ professional quality of life

Patricia Louise Lowe PhD student, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
Samantha Jakimowicz Senior lecturer, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
Tracy Levett-Jones Professor of nursing education and head of school, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia

Why you should read this article:
  • To review your understanding of the philosophical foundations underpinning novel mixed methods research methodologies

  • To evaluate examples of optimal use and appraisal of mixed methods grounded theory methodology

  • To consider applying these guidelines in future mixed methods grounded theory studies

Background Nurse researchers are constantly seeking novel methods of maintaining philosophical congruence while advancing their knowledge of the human condition using paradigmatically diverse means.

Aim To provide an overview of the research philosophies underpinning the mixed methods grounded theory (MM-GT) methodology, illustrate its optimal use and introduce a quality-appraisal tool being developed with reference to extant literature.

Discussion The utility of MM-GT has been effectively demonstrated in the nursing and health literature. Yet, there are examples of how it has been under-used and sub-optimally applied. This article includes a two-phase MM-GT study protocol guided by a pragmatic research philosophy and best practice recommendations that aims to explain neonatal nurses’ professional quality of life.

Conclusion Optimal use of MM-GT’s five essential components – purposive sampling, constant comparative methods with iterative coding and analysis, theoretical saturation, memoing and theory development – combine to produce high-quality, defensible research outputs and new nursing theory.

Implications for practice Research outputs, such as publication and presentation, expounding the multifactorial influences affecting neonatal nurses’ professional quality of life will not only benefit the neonatal nursing community but also contribute to the corpus of nursing and midwifery research and enhance the health, well-being and retention of nurses and midwives more broadly.

Nurse Researcher. doi: 10.7748/nr.2023.e1855

Peer review

This article has been subject to external double-blind peer review and checked for plagiarism using automated software

Correspondence

patricia.l.lowe@student.uts.edu.au

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare

Lowe PL, Jakimowicz S, Levett-Jones T (2023) Using a mixed methods grounded theory methodology to explain neonatal nurses’ professional quality of life. Nurse Researcher. doi: 10.7748/nr.2023.e1855

Published online: 05 January 2023

Want to read more?

Already subscribed? Log in

OR

Unlock full access to RCNi Plus today

Save over 50% on your first 3 months

Your subscription package includes:
  • Unlimited online access to all 10 RCNi Journals and their archives
  • Customisable dashboard featuring 200+ topics
  • RCNi Learning featuring 180+ RCN accredited learning modules
  • RCNi Portfolio to build evidence for revalidation
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
Subscribe
RCN student member? Try Nursing Standard Student

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now

Or