Strategies for balancing internal and external validity in evaluations of interventions
Intended for healthcare professionals
Evidence and practice    

Strategies for balancing internal and external validity in evaluations of interventions

Suzanne Fredericks Professor, Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada
Souraya Sidani Professor, Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada
Mary Fox Associate professor, York University, Toronto, Canada
Joyal Miranda Associate professor, Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada

Background Evaluations of interventions should be carefully designed and conducted to maintain a balance between internal and external validity, with the dual goal of minimising the influence of potential confounders and improving the generalisability or applicability of any findings to practice.

Aim To review strategies to promote balance between internal and external validity in an evaluation of a cognitive-behavioural intervention for chronic insomnia.

Discussion A pragmatic approach is needed to balance internal and external validity, and generate evidence relevant to practice. The authors present strategies to promote such a balance, including using strict eligibility criteria, subgroup analysis, random assignment of patients based on preferences, a no-treatment control condition, and standardised and consistent implementation of the intervention.

Conclusion A balance between internal and external validity is essential to promote enrolment in the study and confidence in attributing its outcomes to an intervention, as well as to provide answers to clinically relevant questions such as who benefits most from which intervention.

Implications for practice The authors recommend researchers conduct a pilot study in advance of an evaluation, to help decide which strategies to use and how to balance internal and external validity.

Nurse Researcher. doi: 10.7748/nr.2019.e1646

Peer review

This article has been subject to external double-blind peer review and has been checked for plagiarism using automated software

Correspondence

sfrederi@ryerson.ca

Conflict of interest

None declared

Fredericks S, Sidani S, Fox M et al (2019) Strategies for balancing internal and external validity in evaluations of interventions. Nurse Researcher. doi: 10.7748/nr.2019.e1646

Published online: 03 October 2019

Want to read more?

Already subscribed? Log in

OR

Unlock full access to RCNi Plus today

Save over 50% on your first 3 months

Your subscription package includes:
  • Unlimited online access to all 10 RCNi Journals and their archives
  • Customisable dashboard featuring 200+ topics
  • RCNi Learning featuring 180+ RCN accredited learning modules
  • RCNi Portfolio to build evidence for revalidation
  • Personalised newsletters tailored to your interests
Subscribe
RCN student member? Try Nursing Standard Student

Alternatively, you can purchase access to this article for the next seven days. Buy now

Or